Impact of interference power constraint on multi-hop cognitive amplify-and-forward relay networks over Nakagami-m fading

In this article, the authors study the effect of peak interference power constraint given by the primary receiver on the performance of multi-hop cognitive amplify-and-forward (AF) relay networks. The athours assume that all involved channels are subject to independent, not necessarily identically distributed Nakagami-m fading and the secondary multi-hop relay network operates in channel state information-assisted AF mode. An analysis of the system performance in terms of outage probability and symbol error rate (SER) is presented. Accordingly, closed-form expressions for the tightly bounded outage probability and SER are formulated which are used for quantifying the impact of the fading channels, the interference power constraint and the number of hops on system performance. More importantly, an asymptotic performance analysis, which intuitively reveals benefits of cooperative diversity of the secondary relay network, is established. The analysis shows that the diversity gain of the considered cognitive relay networks is equal to the minimum of the fading severity parameters of all relaying hops. Also, the interference power constraint imposed by the primary receiver only affects the coding gain of the secondary relay network.

[1]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  Multihop diversity in wireless relaying channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[2]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  Cognitive Amplify-and-Forward Relay Networks Over Nakagami- $m$ Fading , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Masoud Ardakani,et al.  Asymptotically-Exact Performance Bounds of AF Multi-Hop Relaying over Nakagami Fading , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[4]  Fortunato Santucci,et al.  A comprehensive framework for performance analysis of dual-hop cooperative wireless systems with fixed-gain relays over generalized fading channels , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Xin Chen,et al.  Joint Relay Selection and Power Allocation for Energy-Constrained Multi-Hop Cognitive Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[6]  Caijun Zhong,et al.  Outage Analysis of Decode-and-Forward Cognitive Dual-Hop Systems With the Interference Constraint in Nakagami-$m$ Fading Channels , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Zan Li,et al.  On the Performance of Cognitive Relay Networks Under Primary User's Outage Constraint , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Mazen O. Hasna,et al.  Outage probability of multihop transmission over Nakagami fading channels , 2003, IEEE Communications Letters.

[9]  George K. Karagiannidis,et al.  Effect of Feedback Delay on Amplify-and-Forward Relay Networks With Beamforming , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Trung Quang Duong,et al.  Outage Analysis of Cognitive Multihop Networks under Interference Constraints , 2012, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[12]  Guoan Bi,et al.  Game Theoretic Analysis for Spectrum Sharing with Multi-Hop Relaying , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A geometric approach to improve spectrum efficiency for cognitive relay networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Hans-Jurgen Zepernick,et al.  Exact outage probability of cognitive AF relaying with underlay spectrum sharing , 2011 .

[15]  Branka Vucetic,et al.  Performance analysis of beamforming in two hop amplify and forward relay networks with antenna correlation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[16]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Outage Performance for Cognitive Relay Networks with Underlay Spectrum Sharing , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.