Conventional parameter or tolerance designs focus on developing exact methods to minimize quality loss or manufacturing cost. The inherent assumption is that the response functions which represent the link between controllable variables and response values of quality characteristics are known before a design is developed. Moreover, parameter and tolerance values are assumed to be independent controllable variables in previous works; namely, they are determined separately in design activities. Currently, advanced computer software, such as computer-aided engineering, can help engineers to handle design problems with unknown response functions, at the stage of product design and process planning. Therefore, in this study, the software ANSYS was employed to obtain simulation data which represent the response values of quality characteristics. These response values will be used to fit a set of response functions for later analysis. However, previous works in computer simulation for design and planning usually lack consideration of the noise impact from an external design system. To approximate a realistic design environment, various levels of controllable variables, in conjunction with artificial noises created from uncontrollable variables, are used to generate simulated data for statistical analysis via Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Then, an optimization technique, such as mathematical programming, is adopted to integrate these response functions into one formulation so that optimal parameter and tolerance values are concurrently determined, with multiple quality characteristics taken into consideration. A bike-frame design was used to demonstrate the presented approach, followed by multiple quality characteristics of interest: material cost, bike-frame weight, structure reliability, and rigidity dependability. The goal is to minimize material cost and bike frame weight and to maximize structure reliability and rigidity dependability. This approach is useful for solving any complex design problems in the early stages, while providing enhanced functionality, quality, economic benefits, and a shorter design cycle.
[1]
Thomas J. Santner,et al.
The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments
,
2003,
Springer Series in Statistics.
[2]
Margaret J. Robertson,et al.
Design and Analysis of Experiments
,
2006,
Handbook of statistics.
[3]
Donald E. Carter,et al.
Ce Concurrent Engineering: The Product Development Environment for the 1990s
,
1992
.
[4]
Ivan N. Vuchkov,et al.
Quality Improvement with Design of Experiments
,
2001
.
[5]
Angus Jeang,et al.
Combined parameter and tolerance design optimization with quality and cost
,
2001
.
[6]
Gordon Johnston.
Reliability for Technology Engineering and Management
,
2000,
Technometrics.
[7]
Ivan N. Vuchkov,et al.
Quality Improvement with Design of Experiments: A Response Surface Approach
,
2001
.
[8]
Sonja Kuhnt,et al.
Design and analysis of computer experiments
,
2010
.
[9]
David Kendrick,et al.
GAMS, a user's guide
,
1988,
SGNM.
[10]
Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.
Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments
,
1995
.
[11]
A. Jeang,et al.
Robust tolerance design by computer experiment
,
1999
.
[12]
J. Sacks,et al.
A system for quality improvement via computer experiments
,
1991
.
[13]
George Bennett,et al.
LEAST-COST TOLERANCES—II
,
1970
.
[14]
Jasbir S. Arora,et al.
Introduction to Optimum Design
,
1988
.
[15]
Raymond H. Myers,et al.
Response surface methodology in quality improvement
,
1991
.
[16]
Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.
Quality Engineering Using Robust Design
,
1989
.
[17]
L. F. Hauglund,et al.
Least Cost Tolerance Allocation for Mechanical Assemblies with Automated Process Selection
,
1990
.
[18]
Angus Jeang.
Economic tolerance design for quality
,
1995
.