Categorizing natural objects: a comparison of the visual and the haptic modalities

Although the hands are the most important tool for humans to manipulate objects, only little is known about haptic processing of natural objects. Here, we selected a unique set of natural objects, namely seashells, which vary along a variety of object features, while others are shared across all stimuli. To correctly interact with objects, they have to be identified or categorized. For both processes, measuring similarities between objects is crucial. Our goal is to better understand the haptic similarity percept by comparing it to the visual similarity percept. First, direct similarity measures were analyzed using multidimensional scaling techniques to visualize the perceptual spaces of both modalities. We find that the visual and the haptic modality form almost identical perceptual spaces. Next, we performed three different categorization tasks. All tasks exhibit a highly accurate processing of complex shapes of the haptic modality. Moreover, we find that objects grouped into the same category form regions within the perceptual space. Hence, in both modalities, perceived similarity constitutes the basis for categorizing objects. Moreover, both modalities focus on shape to form categories. Taken together, our results lead to the assumption that the same cognitive processes link haptic and visual similarity perception and the resulting categorization behavior.

[1]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Emily W. Bushnell,et al.  Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. , 1999 .

[3]  Robert L. Goldstone The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[4]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[5]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  U. Hahn,et al.  Similarity and categorization , 2001 .

[7]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern multidimensional scaling , 1996 .

[8]  T. James,et al.  The neural basis of haptic object processing. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[9]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[10]  S. Edelman,et al.  Representation of object similarity in human vision: psychophysics and a computational model , 1998, Vision Research.

[11]  T. Hendler,et al.  Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Shimon Edelman,et al.  Representation and recognition in vision , 1999 .

[13]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Feeling with the mind's eye , 1997, Neuroreport.

[14]  Susan Haag,et al.  Effects of vision and haptics on categorizing common objects , 2011, Cognitive Processing.

[15]  E. Bushnell,et al.  Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[16]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape , 2010 .

[17]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Multidimensional scaling analysis of haptic exploratory procedures , 2010, TAP.

[18]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  Learning to Perceive Differences in Solid Shape through Vision and Touch , 2008, Perception.

[19]  Amir Amedi,et al.  A Putative Model of Multisensory Object Representation , 2009, Brain Topography.

[20]  Nao Ninomiya,et al.  The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..

[21]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Visual object understanding , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Myrthe A. Plaisier,et al.  Salient features in 3-D haptic shape perception , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Visual and haptic perceptual spaces show high similarity in humans. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[25]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J. Henrich,et al.  Most people are not WEIRD , 2010, Nature.

[27]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Using curvature information in haptic shape perception of 3D objects , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  S. Ballesteros,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Memory for Visual and Haptic Objects: Cross-Modal Priming Depends on Structural Descriptions , 1999 .

[29]  R. Shepard Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  S. Lacey,et al.  Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Similarity of Tactual and Visual Picture Recognition with Limited Field of View , 1991, Perception.

[32]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceived Shape Similarity among Unfamiliar Objects and the Organization of the Human Object Vision Pathway , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.