The Form of Augmented Force-Feedback Fields and the Efficiency and Satisfaction in Computer-Aided Pointing Tasks

This study investigates operation efficiency and user satisfaction for spatial and temporal shapes of augmented force-feedback fields to be used with computer pointing devices in target acquisition tasks. In an experiment, three different force-field shapes at two different mean force levels were compared, with an electromechanical forcefeedback trackball as control device and with efficiency and user satisfaction as dependent variables. Efficiency was measured by the time required to perform a certain task, and user satisfaction was measured through a subjective rating procedure. Satisfaction results indicate that to a rough approximation, participants can be grouped into those who prefer high and those who prefer low force levels. Members of the former group were most satisfied with force fields with a gradual start and an abrupt ending. This force-field shape also proved to be the most efficient for both groups. When all participants were considered as a single group, none of the effects was found to be statistically significant. A gender effect was also found; in both preference groups women achieved significantly shorter task completion times than men. Actual or potential applications of this research include enabling computer interaction for people prone to repetitive strain injuries and the increment of efficiency and satisfaction in human-computer interaction in general.

[1]  Gerard P. van Galen,et al.  The Role of Size of an Augmented Force Field in Computer-Aided Target Acquisition Tasks , 2005, International journal of human computer interactions.

[2]  F. L. Engel,et al.  Improved efficiency through I- and E-feedback: a trackball with contextual force feedback , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Jon Driver,et al.  Cross-modal links in attention between audition, vision, and touch: Implications for interface design , 1997 .

[4]  David V. Keyson,et al.  TacTool: a tactile rapid prototyping tool for visual interfaces , 1995 .

[5]  Holger Luczak,et al.  Tactile feedback applied to computer mice , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  H Hilde Keuning Augmented force feedback to facilitate target acquisition in human-computer interaction , 2003 .

[7]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[8]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[9]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[10]  Ravin Balakrishnan,et al.  Acquisition of expanding targets , 2002, CHI.

[11]  Motoyuki Akamatsu,et al.  A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages , 1983, Computer.

[13]  Hilde Keuning-Van Oirschot,et al.  Cursor Trajectory Analysis , 2000, Haptic Human-Computer Interaction.

[14]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Haptic Force-Feedback Devices for the Office Computer: Performance and Musculoskeletal Loading Issues , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Arend W A Van Gemmert,et al.  Forearm EMG response activity during motor performance in individuals prone to increased stress reactivity. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[16]  Ingrid M. L. C. Vogels,et al.  Detection of Temporal Delays in Visual-Haptic Interfaces , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Dv David Keyson,et al.  Touch in user interface navigation , 1997 .