Reliability of pathogen control in direct potable reuse: Performance evaluation and QMRA of a full-scale 1 MGD advanced treatment train.

To safely progress toward direct potable reuse (DPR), it is essential to ensure that DPR systems can provide public health protection equivalent to or greater than that of conventional drinking water sources. This study collected data over a one-year period from a full-scale DPR demonstration facility, and used both performance distribution functions (PDFs) and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to define and evaluate the reliability of the advanced water treatment facility (AWTF). The AWTF's ability to control enterovirus, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium was characterized using online monitoring of surrogates in a treatment train consisting of ozone, biological activated carbon, microfiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet light with an advanced oxidation process. This process train was selected to improve reliability by providing redundancy, defined as the provision of treatment beyond the minimum needed to meet regulatory requirements. The PDFs demonstrated treatment that consistently exceeded the 12/10/10-log thresholds for virus, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium, as currently required for potable reuse in California (via groundwater recharge and surface water augmentation). Because no critical process failures impacted pathogen removal performance during the yearlong testing, hypothetical failures were incorporated into the analysis to understand the benefit of treatment redundancy on performance. Each unit process was modeled with a single failure per year lasting four different failure durations: 15 min, 60 min, 8 h, and 24 h. QMRA was used to quantify the impact of failures on pathogen risk. The median annual risk of infection for Cryptosporidium was 4.9 × 10-11 in the absence of failures, and reached a maximum of 1.1 × 10-5 assuming one 24-h failure per process per year. With the inclusion of free chlorine disinfection as part of the treatment process, enterovirus had a median annual infection risk of 1.5 × 10-14 (no failures) and a maximum annual value of 2.1 × 10-5 (assuming one 24-h failure per year). Even with conservative failure assumptions, pathogen risk from this treatment train remains below the risk targets for both the U.S. (10-4 infections/person/year) and the WHO (approximately 10-3 infections/person/year, equivalent to 10-6 DALY/person/year), demonstrating the value of a failure prevention strategy based on treatment redundancy.

[1]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater , 2006 .

[2]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Evaluation of the California Wastewater Reclamation Criteria using enteric virus monitoring data , 1992 .

[3]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases injuries and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. , 1996 .

[4]  P.W.M.H. Smeets,et al.  Stochastic Modelling of Drinking Water Treatment in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment , 2010 .

[5]  P. Gale,et al.  Developments in microbiological risk assessment for drinking water , 2001, Journal of applied microbiology.

[6]  Ow,et al.  Surface Water Treatment Rules , 2015 .

[7]  Greg Leslie,et al.  Resilience of Advanced Water Treatment Plants for Potable Reuse , 2015 .

[8]  Christopher S. Crockett,et al.  Assessing the risk posed by oocysts in drinking water , 1996 .

[9]  Madeleine Forss,et al.  Microbiological Risk Assessment of the Water Reclamation Plant in Windhoek , 2011 .

[10]  D Eisenberg,et al.  A methodology to evaluate water and wastewater treatment plant reliability. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  N J Ashbolt,et al.  A theoretical approach to assess microbial risks due to failures in drinking water systems , 2003, International journal of environmental health research.

[12]  P. Scales,et al.  Pathogen reduction requirements for direct potable reuse in Antarctica: evaluating human health risks in small communities. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  J. Rose,et al.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment , 1999 .

[14]  Reduction of Pathogens, Indicator Bacteria, and Alternative Indicators by Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Processes , 2003 .

[15]  R. Rhodes Trussell,et al.  Potable reuse treatment trains throughout the world , 2013 .

[16]  Philip Berger,et al.  Cryptosporidium Infection Risk: Results of New Dose‐Response Modeling , 2016, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Charles P. Gerba,et al.  Modeling the Risk from Giardia and Viruses in Drinking Water , 1991 .

[18]  Adam W. Olivieri,et al.  Estimation of pathogen removal in an advanced water treatment facility using Monto Carlo simulation , 1999 .

[19]  Hiroaki Tanaka,et al.  Estimating the safety of wastewater reclamation and reuse using enteric virus monitoring data , 1998 .

[20]  C. Gerba,et al.  Virus persistence in groundwater , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[21]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Waste Water Reclamation and Reuse , 2000 .

[22]  Charles N. Haas,et al.  Frameworks for assessing reliability of multiple, independent barriers in potable water reuse , 1998 .

[23]  T. Westrell,et al.  Microbial risk assessment and its implications for risk management in urban water systems , 2004 .

[24]  D. Bernstein,et al.  Human rotavirus studies in volunteers: determination of infectious dose and serological response to infection. , 1986, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[25]  Don Eisenberg,et al.  Reliability Analysis of an Advanced Water Treatment Facility , 1998 .

[26]  D E Burmaster,et al.  Lognormal distributions for water intake by children and adults. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Erfaneh Amoueyan,et al.  Quantifying pathogen risks associated with potable reuse: A risk assessment case study for Cryptosporidium. , 2017, Water research.

[28]  R. Rhodes Trussell,et al.  Achieving Reliability in Potable Reuse: The Four Rs , 2015 .

[29]  Mary E. Schoen,et al.  Comparison of Risk Predicted by Multiple Norovirus Dose–Response Models and Implications for Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  Isaac Warren,et al.  Evaluation of microbiological risks associated with direct potable reuse , 2017 .