Comparison of ICESat Data With Airborne Laser Altimeter Measurements Over Arctic Sea Ice

Surface elevation and roughness measurements from NASA's Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) are compared with high-resolution airborne laser altimeter measurements over the Arctic sea ice north of Alaska, which were taken during the March 2006 EOS Aqua Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer sea ice validation campaign. The comparison of the elevation measurements shows that they agree quite well with correlations of around 0.9 for individual shots and a bias of less than 2 cm. The differences are found to decrease quite rapidly when applying running means. The comparison of the roughness measurements show that there are significant differences between the two data sets, with ICESat generally having higher values. The roughness values are only moderately correlated on an individual-shot basis, but applying running means to the data significantly improves the correlations to as high as 0.9. For the conversion of the elevation measurements into snow-ice freeboard, ocean surface elevation estimates are made with the high-resolution laser altimeter data, as well as several methods using lower resolution ICESat data. Under optimum conditions, i.e., when leads that are larger than the ICESat footprint are present, the ICESat- and Airborne Topographic Mapper-derived freeboards are found to agree to within 2 cm. For other areas, ICESat tends to underestimate the freeboard by up to 9 cm.

[1]  Frederick C. Jackson,et al.  The reflection of impulses from a nonlinear random sea , 1979 .

[2]  Stefan Kern,et al.  Satellite-based estimates of sea-ice volume flux through Fram Strait , 2006, Annals of Glaciology.

[3]  Donald J. Cavalieri,et al.  30‐Year satellite record reveals contrasting Arctic and Antarctic decadal sea ice variability , 2003 .

[4]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice, Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land , 2002 .

[5]  H. Zwally,et al.  Derivation of Range and Range Distributions From Laser Pulse Waveform Analysis for Surface Elevations, Roughness, Slope, and Vegetation Heights , 2012 .

[6]  D. Rothrock,et al.  Thinning of the Arctic sea‐ice cover , 1999 .

[7]  William B. Krabill,et al.  ICESat range and mounting bias estimation over precisely‐surveyed terrain , 2005 .

[8]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) over Arctic sea ice: Retrieval of freeboard , 2007 .

[9]  R. Forsberg,et al.  Arctic Ocean gravity, geoid and sea‐ice freeboard heights from ICESat and GRACE , 2005 .

[10]  Vladimir F. Radionov,et al.  Snow Depth on Arctic Sea Ice , 1999 .

[11]  C S Gardner,et al.  Remote sensing of sea state using laser altimeters. , 1982, Applied optics.

[12]  R. Forsberg,et al.  Sea‐ice thickness from airborne laser altimetry over the Arctic Ocean north of Greenland , 2002 .

[13]  C. Gardner,et al.  Target signatures for laser altimeters: an analysis. , 1982, Applied optics.

[14]  J. Kouba A GUIDE TO USING INTERNATIONAL GNSS SERVICE (IGS) PRODUCTS , 2003 .

[15]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of the ICESat Mission , 2005 .

[16]  Florence Fetterer,et al.  Tracking the Arctic's shrinking ice cover: Another extreme September minimum in 2004 , 2005 .

[17]  Ron Kwok,et al.  ICESat observations of Arctic sea ice: A first look , 2004 .

[18]  Julienne C. Stroeve,et al.  Snow Depth and Ice Thickness Measurements From the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas Collected During the AMSR-Ice03 Campaign , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  René Forsberg,et al.  Arctic Gravity Project — a status , 2001 .

[20]  Ron Kwok,et al.  ICESat over arctic sea ice : Interpretation of altimetric and reflectivity profiles , 2006 .

[21]  Albin J. Gasiewski,et al.  Impact of Surface Roughness on AMSR-E Sea Ice Products , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Robert N. Swift,et al.  Accuracy of airborne laser altimetry over the Greenland ice sheet , 1995 .

[23]  Ron Lindsay,et al.  The thinning of Arctic sea ice, 1988-2003 : Have we passed a tipping point? , 2005 .

[24]  Julienne C. Stroeve,et al.  EOS aqua AMSR-E Arctic sea ice validation program , 2003, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[25]  Keran Claffey,et al.  Ice mass-balance buoys: a tool for measuring and attributing changes in the thickness of the Arctic sea-ice cover , 2006, Annals of Glaciology.