Conjunction Meets Negation: A Study in Cross‐linguistic Variation

The central topic of this inquiry is a cross-linguistic contrast in the interaction of conjunction and negation. In Hungarian (Russian, Serbian, Italian, Japanese), in contrast to English (German), negated definite conjunctions are naturally and exclusively interpreted as 'neither'. It is proposed that in Hungarian-type languages conjunctions simply replicate the behaviour of plurals, their closest semantic relatives. The 'neither' reading is due to the homogeneity presupposition accompanying distributive prediction over pluralities. More puzzling is why English-type languages present a different range of interpretations. By teasing out finer distinctions in focus on connectives, syntactic structure, and context, the paper tracks down missing readings and argues that it is eventually not necessary to postulate a radical cross-linguistic semantic difference. In the course of making that argument it is observed that negated conjunctions on the 'neither' reading carry the expectation that the predicate hold of both conjuncts. The paper investigates several hypotheses concerning the source of this expectation.

[1]  B. Schein.  Plurals and Events , 1994 .

[2]  T. Zimmermann.  Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility , 2000 .

[3]  Jack Hoeksema,et al.  The Semantics of Non-Boolean "And" , 1988, J. Semant..

[4]  H. Kamp,et al.  On Context Dependence In Modal Constructions , 1997 .

[5]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Positive Polarity – Negative Polarity , 2004 .

[6]  Sigrid Beck.  Reciprocals are Definites , 2001 .

[7]  Vivienne Fong,et al.  Variation, ambiguity, and noun classes in English , 2004 .

[8]  Jacob Hoeksema,et al.  The semantics of exception phrases , 1996 .

[9]  Sebastian Löbner,et al.  Polarity in Natural Language: Predication, Quantification and Negation in Particular and Characterizing Sentences , 2000 .

[10]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Hungarian Disjunctions and Positive Polarity , 2002 .

[11]  Francis H. Trithen.  On the Structure of the Russian Verb , 1843 .

[12]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Cumulation is needed: A reply to Winter , 2000 .

[13]  Zsófia Zvolenszky,et al.  Is a Possible-worlds Semantics of Modality Possible? A Problem for Kratzer's Semantics , 2002 .

[14]  Linda R. Waugh,et al.  1 Structure of the Russian Verb , 1984 .

[15]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..

[16]  R. Schwarzschild.  Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity , 1993 .

[17]  J. van der Does,et al.  Quantifiers, Logic, and Language , 1996 .

[18]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Cumulation is Needed: A Reply to Winter (2000) , 2000 .

[19]  Helen de Hoop,et al.  Variation in Form versus Variation in Meaning , 2004 .

[20]  Fred Landman,et al.  Events And Plurality , 2000 .

[21]  Yoad Winter,et al.  Plural Predication and the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis , 2001, J. Semant..