Infants' pitch perception: masking by low- and high-frequency noises.

The present research employed an operant conditioning procedure typically used with infants to test noise masking of pure tones and tonal complexes in adults and in 7-month-old infants. Adults and infants were presented with either pure tones of 160 and 200 Hz or harmonic tonal complexes with pitches equivalent to 160 and 200 Hz. The tonal complexes did not contain energy at the fundamental frequency. After learning these tasks, subjects in the tonal complex group categorized spectrally varying tonal complexes according to the pitch of the missing fundamental. Stimuli were subsequently presented in combination with either a low- or a high-frequency noise. Both age groups successfully discriminated pure tones when combined with a high-frequency noise but not when combined with a low-frequency noise in the same frequency range as the pure tone. Infants, like adults, successfully categorized harmonic tonal complexes based on the pitch of the missing fundamental when those stimuli were combined with a low-frequency noise in the range of the missing fundamental but not when combined with a high-frequency noise which covered the frequency range of the harmonics themselves. These results suggest that infants rely primarily on a central process and not peripherally generated combination tones to hear the pitch of the missing fundamental.

[1]  J. L. Hall Auditory Distortion Products f2−f1 and 2f1−f2 , 1972 .

[2]  R. Patterson Noise masking of a change in residue pitch. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B. L. Cardozo,et al.  Pitch of the Residue , 1962 .

[4]  R. Ritsma Existence Region of the Tonal Residue. I , 1962 .

[5]  J. Licklider “Periodicity” Pitch and “Place” Pitch , 1954 .

[6]  R. Plomp,et al.  DETECTABILITY THRESHOLD FOR COMBINATION TONES. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R J Nozza,et al.  Infant speech-sound discrimination testing: effects of stimulus intensity and procedural model on measures of performance. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  The Central Origin of the Pitch of Complex Tones: Evidence from Musical Interval Recognition , 1972 .

[9]  R. K. Clifton,et al.  Infant pitch perception: evidence for responding to pitch categories and the missing fundamental. , 1985, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  F. Wightman The pattern-transformation model of pitch. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Verification of the optimal probabilistic basis of aural processing in pitch of complex tones. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Comparing the fundamental frequencies of resolved and unresolved harmonics: Evidence for two pitch mechanisms? , 1994 .

[13]  M G Clarkson,et al.  Infants require low-frequency energy to hear the pitch of the missing fundamental. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R K Clifton,et al.  Infants' pitch perception: inharmonic tonal complexes. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. Smoorenburg Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  J. Smurzyński,et al.  Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics , 1990 .