Hyper-Binding

Previous work has shown that older adults encode lexical and semantic information about verbal distractors and use that information to facilitate performance on subsequent tasks. In this study, we investigated whether older adults also form associations between distractors and co-occurring targets. In two experiments, participants performed a 1-back task on pictures superimposed with irrelevant words; 10 min later, participants were given a paired-associates memory task without reference to the 1-back task. The study list included preserved and re-paired (disrupted) pairs from the 1-back task. Older adults showed a memory advantage for preserved pairs and a disadvantage for disrupted pairs, whereas younger adults performed similarly across pair types. These results suggest the existence of a hyper-binding phenomenon in which older adults encode seemingly extraneous co-occurrences in the environment and transfer this knowledge to subsequent tasks. This increased knowledge of how events covary may be the reason why real-world decision-making ability is retained, or even enhanced, with age.

[1]  P. Verhaeghen Aging and vocabulary scores: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[2]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Synchrony effects in cognition: The costs and a benefit , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  M. Naveh-Benjamin Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  AN AGE-DECREMENT IN THE ABILITY TO IGNORE IRRELEVANT INFORMATION. , 1965, Journal of gerontology.

[5]  Jennifer Crocker,et al.  Judgment of Covariation by Social Perceivers , 1981 .

[6]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Feature memory and binding in young and older adults , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. , 1999 .

[8]  John R. Anderson Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory , 1974 .

[9]  M. Masson Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[10]  K. Campbell,et al.  Direct Evidence for the Role of Inhibition in Resolving Interference in Memory , 2010, Psychological science.

[11]  R. Hogarth Deciding Analytically or Trusting your Intuition? The Advantages and Disadvantages of Analytic and Intuitive Thought , 2002 .

[12]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[13]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in working memory capacity , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  M. Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  The associative memory deficit of older adults: the role of strategy utilization. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[15]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. , 1994 .

[16]  J. Henderson,et al.  Concepts of inhibition and developmental psychopathology. , 2007 .

[17]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Why Heuristics Work , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  C. Mckenzie The Accuracy of Intuitive Judgment Strategies: Covariation Assessment and Bayesian Inference , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  What Is Learned During Automatization? The Role of Attention in Constructing an Instance , 1994 .

[20]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: costs and potential benefits. , 2008, Progress in brain research.

[21]  Agatha Lenartowicz,et al.  Attentional disregulation: a benefit for implicit memory. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[22]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  M. Watkins,et al.  Buildup of Proactive Inhibition as a Cue-Overload Effect. , 1975 .

[25]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Distraction as a determinant of processing speed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  P. Wühr,et al.  A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[28]  L. Hasher,et al.  Aging and a benefit of distractibility , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.