What do we learn from motor unit action potentials in surface electromyography?

This article gives an overview of what multichannel surface electromyography can teach us about a motor unit. Background information is given about the generation of surface electromyography in general and surface motor unit potentials in particular. Furthermore, we describe how surface motor unit potentials are related to several motor unit characteristics, such as size, location, neuromuscular junction position, fiber length, fiber type, and metabolic fiber properties. In addition, we show how the spatial characteristics of multichannel surface electromyography can be used to obtain single‐surface motor unit potentials. The possibilities, challenges, and problems are discussed. Finally, several examples of surface motor unit potential analyses are given. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Muscle Nerve Supplement 11: S92–S97, 2002

[1]  Karin Roeleveld,et al.  Motor unit size estimation of enlarged motor units with surface electromyography , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  C. Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  E Stålberg,et al.  Macro EMG, a new recording technique. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Influence of motoneuron firing synchronization on SEMG characteristics in dependence of electrode position. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Muscle fibre conduction velocity in motor units of the human anterior tibial muscle: a new size principle parameter. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Enrico Gobbetti,et al.  Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering , 1999 .

[7]  L Arendt-Nielsen,et al.  Measurement of Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity in Humans: Techniques and Applications , 1989, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[8]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Near- and far-fields: source characteristics and the conducting medium in neurophysiology. , 1997, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[9]  D Kosarov,et al.  Studying the alpha motoneurone activity by investigating motor units of various sizes. , 1972, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Volume conduction models for surface EMG; confrontation with measurements. , 1997, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[11]  T. Masuda,et al.  The propagation of motor unit action potential and the location of neuromuscular junction investigated by surface electrode arrays. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  C. Richardson,et al.  Clinical utility of surface EMG: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. , 2001, Neurology.

[13]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Propagation disturbance of motor unit action potentials during transient paresis in generalized myotonia: a high-density surface EMG study. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  A. Monster,et al.  Surface electromyogram potentials of motor units; Relationship between potential size and unit location in a large human skeletal muscle , 1980, Experimental Neurology.

[15]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Magnetic stimulation‐induced modulations of motor unit firings extracted from multi‐channel surface EMG , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[16]  C J De Luca,et al.  Recruitment threshold and muscle fiber conduction velocity of single motor units. , 1991, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  A Note on the Noninvasive Estimation of Muscle Fiber Conduction Velocity , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Motor unit potential contribution to surface electromyography. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  D. Stegeman,et al.  The motor unit potential distribution over the skin surface and its use in estimating the motor unit location. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[20]  E Stålberg,et al.  The role of electromyography in neurology. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  E Stålberg.  Single fiber EMG, macro EMG, and scanning EMG. New ways of looking at the motor unit. , 1986, CRC critical reviews in clinical neurobiology.

[22]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Motor unit size estimation: confrontation of surface EMG with macro EMG. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  E. van Alphen,et al.  Estimation from surface EMG of the distribution of motor unit sizes in the m. vastus lateralis , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[24]  D F Stegeman,et al.  Recent progress in the diagnostic use of surface EMG for neurological diseases. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[25]  A. McComas,et al.  Motor unit estimation: Anxieties and achievements , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[26]  E Stålberg,et al.  The calculated radial decline of the extracellular action potential compared with in situ measurements in the human brachial biceps. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  Dick F. Stegeman,et al.  Impaired motor cortical inhibition in Parkinson's disease: motor unit responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  H Lahrmann,et al.  Clinical utility of surface EMG: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. , 2001, Neurology.