Investigative safety science as a competitive advantage for Pharma

Introduction: Following a US National Academy of Sciences report in 2007 entitled “Toxicity Testing of the 21st Century: a Vision and a Strategy,” significant advances within translational drug safety sciences promise to revolutionize drug discovery and development. The purpose of this review is to outline why investigative safety science is a competitive advantage for the pharmaceutical industry. Areas covered: The article discusses the essential goals for modern investigative toxicologists including: cross-species target biology; molecular pathways of toxicity; and development of predictive tools, models and biomarkers that allow discovery researchers and clinicians to anticipate safety problems and plan ways to address them, earlier than ever before. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the importance of investigating unanticipated clinical safety signals through a combination of mechanistic preclinical studies and/or molecular characterization of clinical samples from affected organs. Expert opinion: The traditional boundaries between pharma industry teams focusing on safety/efficacy and preclinical/clinical development are rapidly disappearing in favor of translational safety science-centric organizations with a vision of bringing more effective medicines forward safely and quickly. Comparative biology and mechanistic toxicology approaches facilitate: i) identifying translational safety biomarkers; ii) identifying new drug targets/indications; and iii) mitigating off-target toxicities. These value-adding safety science contributions will change traditional toxicologists from side-effect identifiers to drug development enablers.

[1]  N. Rosen,et al.  Induction of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas by RAF inhibitors: cause for concern? , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  T. Jones,et al.  Identification and removal of immunogenicity in therapeutic proteins. , 2007, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[3]  F. Pognan,et al.  Mapping the epigenome--impact for toxicology. , 2009, EXS.

[4]  J. Kramer,et al.  The application of discovery toxicology and pathology towards the design of safer pharmaceutical lead candidates , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[5]  Albert P. Li,et al.  An integrated, multidisciplinary approach for drug safety assessment. , 2004, Drug discovery today.

[6]  H. Akari,et al.  Diversity of MHC class I haplotypes in cynomolgus macaques , 2011, Immunogenetics.

[7]  Michael R. Johnson,et al.  HLA-A*3101 and carbamazepine-induced hypersensitivity reactions in Europeans. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Dennis,et al.  Highly specific off-target binding identified and eliminated during the humanization of an antibody against FGF receptor 4 , 2011, mAbs.

[9]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: bringing the vision to life. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[10]  P. Bugelski,et al.  Predictive power of preclinical studies in animals for the immunogenicity of recombinant therapeutic proteins in humans. , 2004, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[11]  P. Couttet,et al.  Epigenomics – Impact for Drug Safety Sciences , 2012 .

[12]  Y. Will,et al.  New insights in drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity. , 2011, Current pharmaceutical design.

[13]  Yuan-Tsong Chen,et al.  Shared and restricted T-cell receptor use is crucial for carbamazepine-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome. , 2011, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[14]  Yvonne Will,et al.  Evaluation of drugs with specific organ toxicities in organ-specific cell lines. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[15]  F. Sistare,et al.  Preclinical Predictors of Clinical Safety: Opportunities for Improvement , 2007, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[16]  F. Pistollato,et al.  Standardization of pluripotent stem cell cultures for toxicity testing , 2012, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[17]  Frank D Sistare,et al.  Plasma MicroRNAs as sensitive and specific biomarkers of tissue injury. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  B. Cravatt,et al.  Strategies for discovering and derisking covalent, irreversible enzyme inhibitors. , 2010, Future medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  The Future of Toxicity Testing , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[20]  James L Stevens,et al.  The future of drug safety testing: expanding the view and narrowing the focus. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[21]  L. Hood,et al.  Circulating microRNAs, potential biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  M. Kohn,et al.  Determining genetic background in captive stocks of cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) , 2008, Journal of medical primatology.

[23]  Jennifer Sims,et al.  Safety and immunotoxicity assessment of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies , 2010, mAbs.

[24]  M Pirmohamed,et al.  Advances in molecular toxicology-towards understanding idiosyncratic drug toxicity. , 2000, Toxicology.

[25]  Dolores Diaz,et al.  Phosphorous dysregulation induced by MEK small molecule inhibitors in the rat involves blockade of FGF-23 signaling in the kidney. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[26]  Jonathan Moggs,et al.  Circulating microRNAs as potential markers of human drug‐induced liver injury , 2011, Hepatology.

[27]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Are in vitro tests suitable for regulatory use? , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[28]  Fuminori Moriyasu,et al.  Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  Krishna Prasad,et al.  Renal biomarker qualification submission: a dialog between the FDA-EMEA and Predictive Safety Testing Consortium , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[30]  M. Manns,et al.  Humanized mice for modeling human infectious disease: challenges, progress, and outlook. , 2009, Cell host & microbe.

[31]  P. Couttet,et al.  Phenobarbital Mediates an Epigenetic Switch at the Constitutive Androstane Receptor (CAR) Target Gene Cyp2b10 in the Liver of B6C3F1 Mice , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  James L Stevens,et al.  Future of toxicology--mechanisms of toxicity and drug safety: where do we go from here? , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[33]  C. Münz,et al.  Mice with human immune system components as in vivo models for infections with human pathogens , 2011, Immunology and cell biology.

[34]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[35]  John C Lindon,et al.  An integrated metabonomic investigation of acetaminophen toxicity in the mouse using NMR spectroscopy. , 2003, Chemical research in toxicology.

[36]  U. Boelsterli,et al.  Healthy animals and animal models of human disease(s) in safety assessment of human pharmaceuticals, including therapeutic antibodies. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[37]  Jenny J. Fischer,et al.  Probing small molecule-protein interactions: A new perspective for functional proteomics. , 2011, Journal of proteomics.

[38]  G. Aithal,et al.  Preempting and preventing drug-induced liver injury , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[39]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Activation of T cells by carbamazepine and carbamazepine metabolites. , 2006, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[40]  Yuri Nikolsky,et al.  Quantitative knowledge-based analysis in compound safety assessment , 2011, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[41]  Y. Dragan,et al.  What do we need to know prior to thinking about incorporating an epigenetic evaluation into safety assessments? , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[42]  Viswanath Devanarayan,et al.  Fit-for-Purpose Method Development and Validation for Successful Biomarker Measurement , 2006, Pharmaceutical Research.

[43]  Marcus Bantscheff,et al.  Chemoproteomic approaches to drug target identification and drug profiling. , 2012, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[44]  Raymond R Tice,et al.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: Reflections and future directions , 2011, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[45]  Andreas Luch,et al.  T-cell recognition of chemicals, protein allergens and drugs: towards the development of in vitro assays , 2010, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[46]  M. Cases,et al.  Inroads to Predict in Vivo Toxicology—An Introduction to the eTOX Project , 2012, International journal of molecular sciences.

[47]  John C Lindon,et al.  Integrated application of transcriptomics and metabonomics yields new insight into the toxicity due to paracetamol in the mouse. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[48]  James S MacDonald,et al.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a view from the pharmaceutical industry. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[49]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Molecular imaging in drug discovery and development , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[50]  N. Grenier,et al.  Contrast agents for functional and cellular MRI of the kidney. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[51]  Meir Glick,et al.  Computational methods for early predictive safety assessment from biological and chemical data , 2011, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[52]  Frank Dieterle,et al.  Tissue-specific, non-invasive toxicity biomarkers: translation from preclinical safety assessment to clinical safety monitoring , 2009, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[53]  S. Mallal,et al.  Pharmacogenetics of drug hypersensitivity. , 2010, Pharmacogenomics.

[54]  Frank D Sistare,et al.  Promise of new translational safety biomarkers in drug development and challenges to regulatory qualification. , 2011, Biomarkers in medicine.

[55]  F. Pognan,et al.  Toxicogenomics applied to predictive and exploratory toxicology for the safety assessment of new chemical entities: a long road with deep potholes. , 2007, Progress in drug research. Fortschritte der Arzneimittelforschung. Progres des recherches pharmaceutiques.

[56]  J. Roujeau,et al.  Drug-induced epidermal necrolysis: Important new piece to end the puzzle. , 2011, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[57]  Toshihiko Ogura,et al.  Identification of a Primary Target of Thalidomide Teratogenicity , 2010, Science.

[58]  F W Lee,et al.  Testing paradigm for prediction of development-limiting barriers and human drug toxicity. , 2004, Chemico-biological interactions.

[59]  S. Lewitzky,et al.  OC-035 Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis , 2010, Gut.

[60]  G. Aithal,et al.  Hepatotoxicity related to antirheumatic drugs , 2011, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[61]  J. Casanova,et al.  Primary immunodeficiencies may reveal potential infectious diseases associated with immune-targeting mAb treatments. , 2010, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[62]  Minutes,et al.  MOLECULAR IMAGING IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT , 2003 .

[63]  B. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Multifaceted Evaluation of Imatinib-induced Cardiotoxicity in the Rat , 2011, Toxicologic pathology.

[64]  Anthony R Scialli,et al.  Thalidomide: the tragedy of birth defects and the effective treatment of disease. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[65]  Scott Boyer,et al.  Application of data mining and visualization techniques for the prediction of drug-induced nausea in man. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[66]  Robert P Tonge,et al.  Genomics and proteomics analysis of acetaminophen toxicity in mouse liver. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[67]  A. Cowley The genetic dissection of essential hypertension , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[68]  Chen-Yang Shen,et al.  Carbamazepine-induced toxic effects and HLA-B*1502 screening in Taiwan. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[69]  J. Trosko Commentary on ‘‘Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A vision and a Strategy’’: Stem Cells and Cell-Cell Communication as Fundamental Targets in Assessing the Potential Toxicity of Chemicals , 2010, Human & experimental toxicology.

[70]  H. Danahay,et al.  Membrane capacitance and conductance changes parallel mucin secretion in the human airway epithelium. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[71]  G. Silvestri,et al.  Primate genomes for biomedicine , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[72]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Hypersensitivity reactions to carbamazepine: characterization of the specificity, phenotype, and cytokine profile of drug-specific T cell clones. , 2003, Molecular pharmacology.

[73]  Luis G Valerio Computational science in drug metabolism and toxicology , 2010, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[74]  Xudong Zhang,et al.  Medium to high throughput screening: microfabrication and chip-based technology. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[75]  M. Festing Improving toxicity screening and drug development by using genetically defined strains. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[76]  T. Rosenquist Genetic loci that affect aristolochic acid-induced nephrotoxicity in the mouse. , 2011, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[77]  J. Uetrecht,et al.  Screening for the potential of a drug candidate to cause idiosyncratic drug reactions. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[78]  A. Schmid,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the growth kinetics of chemically induced mouse liver tumors by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[79]  J. Luyendyk,et al.  Inflammatory Stress and Idiosyncratic Hepatotoxicity: Hints from Animal Models , 2009, Pharmacological Reviews.