Approaching the architectural native: a graphical transcription method to capture sketching and gesture activity

As a research team without architectural training, we approached a total of 22 experienced architects and designers in order to investigate architectural design practice with an emphasis on human wayfinding. For the main study, eight informers developed circulation systems for a number of case studies. Our graphical transcription method allowed us to systematically investigate the sketching and gesture activity as is typical in design practice. Our analysis reveals the early design decisions of our informers and links them to priorities and the resulting design solutions. Regarding our method we can conclude that it is possible to gain insight into the concepts and work practices of a visual domain or profession, even for researchers untrained in that domain.

[1]  Romedi Passini,et al.  Wayfinding design: logic, application and some thoughts on universality , 1996 .

[2]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes , 2006 .

[3]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992 .

[4]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[5]  Anna T. Cianciolo,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Tacit Knowledge, Practical Intelligence, and Expertise , 2006 .

[6]  R. Passini,et al.  Wayfinding and dementia: Some research findings and a new look at design , 1998 .

[7]  Leon Sterling,et al.  Engineering the social: The role of shared artifacts , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Matthew Frederick,et al.  101 Things I Learned in Architecture School , 2007 .

[9]  Paul Laseau,et al.  Graphic thinking for architects and designers , 1980 .

[10]  Steffen Werner,et al.  Cognition Meets Le Corbusier-Cognitive Principles of Architectural Design , 2003, Spatial Cognition.

[11]  Gesine Marquardt,et al.  Kriterienkatalog Demenzfreundliche Architektur Möglichkeiten zur Unterstützung der räumlichen Orientierung in stationären Altenpflegeeinrichtungen , 2006 .

[12]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Conceptual diagrams in creative architectural practice: the case of Daniel Libeskind's Jewish Museum , 2012, Architectural Research Quarterly.

[13]  Georg Vrachliotis.  Articulating Space through Architectural Diagrams , 2005, AAAI Spring Symposium: Reasoning with Mental and External Diagrams: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance.

[14]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Linkography : Assessing Design Productivity , 1990 .

[15]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Mediating artifacts in architectural design: a non-visual exploration , 2011 .

[16]  Gabriela Goldschmidt.  Linkography: Unfolding the Design Process , 2014 .

[17]  Donald Appleyard,et al.  Why Buildings Are Known , 1969 .

[18]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  What designers know , 2018, The Design Student’s Journey.

[19]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[20]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[21]  J. Whyte,et al.  Visual representations as ‘artefacts of knowing’ , 2007 .

[22]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[23]  S. A. Gregory,et al.  Design and the Design Method , 1966 .

[24]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Conceptualizing Tangible Augmented Reality Systems for Design Learning , 2008 .

[25]  Duncan Philip.  ESSAY: THE PRACTICAL FAILURE OF ARCHITECTURAL PSYCHOLOGY , 1996 .

[26]  Bruce G. Buchanan,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[27]  Rachael Luck,et al.  Seeing architecture in action: designing, evoking, and depicting space and form in embodied interaction , 2014 .

[28]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Computers, words and pictures , 1997 .

[29]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Diagrams in the Mind and in the World: Relations between Internal and External Visualizations , 2004, Diagrams.

[30]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives , 2006 .

[31]  N. Cross.  Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[32]  D. McNeill.  Gesture and Thought , 2005 .

[33]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  The thinking eye: visual re-cognition in design emergence , 2002 .

[34]  Jerry Weisman,et al.  Evaluating Architectural Legibility , 1981 .

[35]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions , 1998 .

[36]  M. Benedikt,et al.  To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields , 1979 .

[37]  D. Barr,et al.  Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[38]  Mark Stefik,et al.  Introduction to knowledge systems , 1995 .

[39]  Rachael Luck.  Using artefacts to mediate understanding in design conversations , 2007 .

[40]  David Kirsh,et al.  Thinking with external representations , 2010, AI & SOCIETY.

[41]  Frédéric Landragin.  The role of gesture in multimodal referring actions , 2002, Proceedings. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces.

[42]  Vinod Goel,et al.  The Structure of Design Problem Spaces , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. , 1985 .

[44]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  The designer as a team o f one , 1995 .

[45]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Eliciting and Representing the Knowledge of Experts , 2006 .