Social networks and Internet connectivity effects

This paper explores the impact of communication media and the Internet on connectivity between people. Results from a series of social network studies of media use are used as background for exploration of these impacts. These studies explored the use of all available media among members of an academic research group and among distance learners. Asking about media use as well as about the strength of the tie between communicating pairs revealed that those more strongly tied used more media to communicate than weak ties, and that media use within groups conformed to a unidimensional scale, showing a configuration of different tiers of media use supporting social networks of different ties strengths. These results lead to a number of implications regarding media and Internet connectivity, including: how media use can be added to characteristics of social network ties; how introducing a medium can create latent tie connectivity among group members that provides the technical means for activating weak ties, and also how a change in a medium can disrupt existing weak tie networks; how the tiers of media use also suggest that certain media support different kinds of information flow; and the importance of organization-level decisions about what media to provide and promote. The paper concludes with a discussion of implications for Internet effects.

[1]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[2]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[3]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[4]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[5]  J. Barlow,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2003 .

[6]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Time matters in groups , 1990 .

[7]  Howard Rheingold.  Smart mobs : Les communautés intelligentes mobiles comment reconnaître le futur quand il vous tombe dessus ? , 2003 .

[8]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[9]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[10]  Sarai Lastra,et al.  Harvesting community knowledge , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Neil Ward,et al.  Coping with Crisis in Cumbria: The Consequences of Foot and Mouth , 2002 .

[12]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[13]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations , 1994 .

[14]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  C. Haythornthwaite.  Building Virtual Communities: Building Social Networks Via Computer Networks: Creating and Sustaining Distributed Learning Communities , 2002 .

[17]  K. A. Renninger,et al.  Building Virtual Communities: Learning and Change in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[18]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Exploring Multiplexity: Social Network Structures in a Computer-Supported Distance Learning Class , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[19]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[20]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Juggling Multiple Social Worlds , 2001 .

[21]  Martin Lea,et al.  Contexts of computer-mediated communication , 1992 .

[22]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[23]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Radicals of presentation: visibility, relation, and co-presence in persistent conversation , 2003, New Media Soc..

[24]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[25]  K. Bruffee.  Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1995 .

[26]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[27]  D. Eagle,et al.  Community informatics : shaping computer-mediated social relations , 2001 .

[28]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction , 1999 .

[29]  N. Baym.  Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community , 1999 .

[30]  Jennifer L. Gregg,et al.  Reformulating the Internet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. , 2001 .

[31]  Andrea L. Kavanaugh,et al.  Community Networks--Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia , 1997 .

[32]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[33]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  M. Gurstein.  Community Informatics: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications Technologies , 2000 .

[35]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Online Personal Networks: Size, Composition and Media Use among Distance Learners , 2000, New Media Soc..

[36]  Kenneth A. Bruffee,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1999 .

[37]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[38]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[39]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Studying Online Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Work relationships and media use: A social network analysis , 1995 .

[41]  Patricia R. Webb.  Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community , 1996 .

[42]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[43]  John Arquilla,et al.  Networks, Netwars, and the Fight for the Future , 2001, First Monday.

[44]  L. Kendall.  Hanging Out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online , 2002 .

[45]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[46]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Work, Friendship, and Media Use for Information Exchange in a Networked Organization , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[47]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[48]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2002 .

[49]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[50]  David Mason,et al.  Community Informatics: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications Technologies , 2001 .

[51]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Statistical Models for Social Support Networks , 1993 .

[52]  N. Nie.  Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet , 2001 .