Self-monitoring of glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus:a Bayesian meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparisons

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the relative effectiveness of interventions with self-monitoring blood glucose and self-monitoring of urine glucose, versus interventions without self-monitoring, in terms of HbA1c reductions in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: Thirteen published full reports on randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of self-monitoring glucose were identified by a systematic search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library (1966–Nov 2005) and previous reviews. Three types of studies were included: self-monitoring of blood glucose versus no self-monitoring, self-monitoring of blood glucose versus self-monitoring of urine glucose and self-monitoring of blood glucose with regular feedback versus monitoring without feedback. The internal validity of studies was assessed systematically by two reviewers, using 13 criteria of a validated list. Results from the three types of studies were analysed simultaneously with a Bayesian meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparisons. Results: Adjusted for baseline HbA1c level and internal validity, interventions with self-monitoring of blood glucose showed a reduction in HbA1c of 0.40 percentage-points (%) (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.07 to 0.70%) in comparison to interventions without self-monitoring. Regular feedback more than doubled the HbA1c reduction. Self-monitoring of urine glucose showed comparable results to interventions without self-monitoring (0.02% decrease in HbA1c; 95% CrI –0.62 to 0.70%). There is a 88% probability that interventions with self-monitoring blood glucose are more effective than interventions with urine glucose monitoring (relative reduction in HbA1c is 0.38%, 95% CrI –0.30 to 1.00%). Conclusion: The randomized clinical trials performed to date provided positive results on the effectiveness of interventions with self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Regular medical feedback of the monitored HbA1c levels is important. Furthermore, self-monitoring of blood glucose is likely to be more effective than self-monitoring of urine glucose.

[1]  S. Martin,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes and long-term outcome: an epidemiological cohort study , 2006, Diabetologia.

[2]  Deborah M Caldwell,et al.  Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  L. Bouter,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a systematic review. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[4]  M. Davidson,et al.  The effect of self monitoring of blood glucose concentrations on glycated hemoglobin levels in diabetic patients not taking insulin: a blinded, randomized trial. , 2005, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  Kathryn Tan,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose as part of a multi-component therapy among non-insulin requiring type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis (1966–2004)* , 2005, Current medical research and opinion.

[6]  G. Lu,et al.  Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  S. Wild,et al.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[8]  P Drouin,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Auto-Surveillance Intervention Active (ASIA) study. , 2003, Diabetes & metabolism.

[9]  A E Ades,et al.  A chain of evidence with mixed comparisons: models for multi‐parameter synthesis and consistency of evidence , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Hee-Seung Kim,et al.  Establishment of blood glucose monitoring system using the internet. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[11]  G. Mertes,et al.  Meal-related structured self-monitoring of blood glucose: effect on diabetes control in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[12]  C. Hanis,et al.  Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: the Starr County border health initiative. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[13]  R. Glasgow,et al.  In diabetes care, moving from compliance to adherence is not enough. Something entirely different is needed. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[14]  S. Halimi.  [Benefits of blood glucose self-monitoring in the management of insulin-dependent (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM). Analysis of the literature: mixed results]. , 1998, Diabetes & metabolism.

[15]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[16]  N. Black,et al.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[17]  D. Etzwiler.  Chronic Care: A Need in Search of a System , 1997, The Diabetes educator.

[18]  A. Faas,et al.  The Efficacy of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in NIDDM subjects: A criteria-based literature review , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[19]  D. Kerr,et al.  Comparison of blood or urine testing by patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes: patient survey after randomised crossover trial , 1997, BMJ.

[20]  J. Lenaghan,et al.  The rationing debate: Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions – The case for , 1997 .

[21]  L. Jaber,et al.  Evaluation of a Pharmaceutical Care Model on Diabetes Management , 1996, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[22]  M. Clarke,et al.  Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1995, BMJ.

[23]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[24]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews , 1994 .

[25]  D. Muchmore,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in overweight type 2 diabetic patients , 1994, Acta Diabetologica.

[26]  Denise Kendrick,et al.  Health care needs assessment , 1993 .

[27]  G. Rutten,et al.  Feasibility and effects of a diabetes type II protocol with blood glucose self-monitoring in general practice. , 1990, Family practice.

[28]  E. DeLong,et al.  Impact of Glucose Self-Monitoring on Non-lnsulin-Treated Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Blood and Urine Testing , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[29]  K. Mann,et al.  Follow-up Intervention: Its Effect on Compliance Behavior to a Diabetes Regimen , 1990, The Diabetes educator.

[30]  G. Slama,et al.  Is glucose self-monitoring beneficial in non-insulin-treated diabetic patients? Results of a randomized comparative trial. , 1989, Diabete & metabolisme.

[31]  L. Epstein,et al.  Does self-monitoring of blood glucose levels improve dietary compliance for obese patients with type II diabetes? , 1986, The American journal of medicine.

[32]  M. Gulliford,et al.  Monitoring blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[33]  Russell E. Glasgow.  In diabetes care, moving from compliance to adherence is not enough , 1999 .

[34]  The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial , 1998 .

[35]  M. de Luise,et al.  Diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.