Performance measures often fail to indicate the amount of effort expended by an operator in reaching various levels of task performance. Secondary or loading task techniques have been developed to overcome this problem. However, with the loading task technique, a problem of interpretation arises when both primary and secondary task measures vary with operator performance. The cross-adaptive operator loading technique, which automatically adjusts the difficulty level of the loading task on the basis of primary task performance, is suggested as a solution to this problem. Data are presented which demonstrate that the cross-adaptive technique effectively standardizes scores on the primary task while casting all the variance in performance to the loading task scores. The cross-adaptive secondary scores thereby become a single unambiguous and sensitive index of effort expended to reach a pre-established level of task performance. Procedures for the implementation of the cross-adaptive techniques are discussed and guidelines for its use are suggested.
[1]
H. Quastler.
Information theory in psychology
,
1955
.
[2]
Edwin M. Hudson.
ADAPTIVE TRAINING AND NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR.
,
1964
.
[3]
W. D. Garvey,et al.
Interactions among operator variables, system dynamics, and task-induced stress.
,
1959
.
[4]
E. O. Poulton,et al.
MEASURING THE ORDER OF DIFFICULTY OF VISUAL-MOTOR TASKS
,
1958
.
[5]
W. B. Knowles,et al.
Operator Loading Tasks
,
1963,
Human factors.
[6]
H P BAHRICK,et al.
Extra-task performance as a measure of learning a primary task.
,
1954,
Journal of experimental psychology.
[7]
J M Rolfe,et al.
A Psychophysiological Study of Compensatory Tracking on a Digital Display
,
1965,
Human factors.
[8]
H P BAHRICK,et al.
Effect of incentives upon reactions to peripheral stimuli.
,
1952,
Journal of experimental psychology.
[9]
W. D. Garvey,et al.
Response time patterns associated with various display-control relationships.
,
1954,
Journal of experimental psychology.