Coseismic deformation of the 2002 Denali fault earthquake: Contributions from synthetic aperture radar range offsets

[1] We investigate coseismic deformation from the 2002 Denali fault earthquake using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) range offsets. Through a cross-correlation technique, we form a range offset map from two radar amplitude images. A profile across the fault at the Trans-Alaska Pipeline shows right-lateral strike-slip and displacement values that agree with predictions from a GPS-based slip model to within the uncertainty of the range offset data. Using a fixed strike-slip/dip-slip ratio taken from geologic measurements, we derive a lateral slip estimate from the range offsets. This slip estimate shows that the largest geologic offset measurement in a region most accurately represents the full slip value. We then invert a combination of the range offsets, GPS data, and geologic surface offset data to solve for the slip distribution on a three-dimensional fault model in an elastic half-space. The combined model displays highly variable slip, with values generally increasing from west to east along the Denali fault, as well as four major patches of high slip on that fault. As expected, the combined model is nearly identical to the GPS-based model outside the SAR coverage area. Within the coverage area, however, the combined model has better constraints and predicts slip values much closer to the geologic measurements. The offset map displays asymmetrical displacements across the fault. We show that a combination of a bending fault, variable slip, and the SAR line-of-sight geometry can explain this asymmetry. We also discuss how fault geometry influences slip and moment release along the rupture.

[1]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Interactions between the Landers and Hector Mine, California, Earthquakes from Space Geodesy, Boundary Element Modeling, and Time-Dependent Friction , 2002 .

[2]  GEOFFREY KING,et al.  Role of Fault Bends in the Initiation and Termination of Earthquake Rupture , 1985, Science.

[3]  S. Wiemer,et al.  Seismotectonics of the Central Denali Fault, Alaska, and the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake Sequence , 2004 .

[4]  A. Frankel Rupture Process of the M 7.9 Denali Fault, Alaska, Earthquake: Subevents, Directivity, and Scaling of High-Frequency Ground Motions , 2004 .

[5]  Jean Taboury,et al.  Measuring near field coseismic displacements from SAR images: Application to the Landers Earthquake , 1999 .

[6]  Karim E. Mattar,et al.  Influence of ionospheric electron density fluctuations on satellite radar interferometry , 2000 .

[7]  H. Zebker,et al.  Fault Slip Distribution of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Estimated from Satellite Radar and GPS Measurements , 2002 .

[8]  Y. Okada Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1985 .

[9]  Peltzer,et al.  Evidence of Nonlinear Elasticity of the Crust from the Mw7.6 Manyi (Tibet) Earthquake. , 1999, Science.

[10]  Douglas S. Dreger,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic rupture models of the November 3, 2002 Mw7.9 Denali, Alaska, earthquake , 2003 .

[11]  P. Segall,et al.  Estimation of depth‐dependent fault slip from measured surface deformation with application to the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake , 1993 .

[12]  P. Stark Bounded-Variable Least-Squares: an Algorithm and Applications , 2008 .

[13]  J. C. Savage Equivalent strike‐slip earthquake cycles in half‐space and lithosphere‐asthenosphere earth models , 1990 .

[14]  A. Crone,et al.  The susitna glacier thrust fault: Characteristics of surface ruptures on the fault that initiated the 2002 denali fault earthquake , 2004 .

[15]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  Coseismic slip distribution of the 2002 MW7.9 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska, determined from GPS measurements , 2003 .

[16]  Steven M. Day,et al.  The 1999 İzmit, Turkey, Earthquake: A 3D Dynamic Stress Transfer Model of Intraearthquake Triggering , 2002 .

[17]  K. Mattar,et al.  Reducing ionospheric electron density errors in satellite radar interferometry applications , 2002 .

[18]  Zhong Lu,et al.  Constraining the Slip Distribution and Fault Geometry of the Mw 7.9, 3 November 2002, Denali Fault Earthquake with Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar and Global Positioning System Data , 2004 .

[19]  Eric J. Fielding,et al.  Displacement field and slip distribution of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake from SAR imagery , 2006 .

[20]  A. Barka,et al.  Strike‐slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity , 1988 .

[21]  Timothy E. Dawson,et al.  The 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake, Alaska: A Large Magnitude, Slip-Partitioned Event , 2003, Science.

[22]  J. K. Mitchell,et al.  Coseismic deformation of the 2002 Denali Fault earthquake: Insights from GPS measurements , 2006 .

[23]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  Surface Rupture and Slip Distribution of the Denali and Totschunda Faults in the 3 November 2002 M 7.9 Earthquake, Alaska , 2004 .

[24]  P. Segall,et al.  The co-seismic slip distribution of the Landers earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[25]  Michel Bouchon,et al.  Propagation of a shear crack on a nonplanar fault: A method of calculation , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[26]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[27]  Jean Taboury,et al.  Measuring ground displacements from SAR amplitude images: Application to the Landers Earthquake , 1999 .

[28]  D. Dreger,et al.  Inverse Kinematic and Forward Dynamic Models of the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake, Alaska , 2004 .