Digital Microfluidics for the Detection of Selected Inorganic Ions in Aerosols

A prototype aerosol detection system is presented that is designed to accurately and quickly measure the concentration of selected inorganic ions in the atmosphere. The aerosol detection system combines digital microfluidics technology, aerosol impaction and chemical detection integrated on the same chip. Target compounds are the major inorganic aerosol constituents: sulfate, nitrate and ammonium. The digital microfluidic system consists of top and bottom plates that sandwich a fluid layer. Nozzles for an inertial impactor are built into the top plate according to known, scaling principles. The deposited air particles are densely concentrated in well-defined deposits on the bottom plate containing droplet actuation electrodes of the chip in fixed areas. The aerosol collection efficiency for particles larger than 100 nm in diameter was higher than 95%. After a collection phase, deposits are dissolved into a scanning droplet. Due to a sub-microliter droplet size, the obtained extract is highly concentrated. Droplets then pass through an air/oil interface on chip for colorimetric analysis by spectrophotometry using optical fibers placed between the two plates of the chip. To create a standard curve for each analyte, six different concentrations of liquid standards were chosen for each assay and dispensed from on-chip reservoirs. The droplet mixing was completed in a few seconds and the final droplet was transported to the detection position as soon as the mixing was finished. Limits of detection (LOD) in the final droplet were determined to be 11 ppm for sulfate and 0.26 ppm for ammonium. For nitrate, it was impossible to get stable measurements. The LOD of the on-chip measurements for sulfate was close to that obtained by an off-chip method using a Tecan spectrometer. LOD of the on-chip method for ammonium was about five times larger than what was obtained with the off-chip method. For the current impactor collection air flow (1 L/min) and 1 h collection time, the converted LODs in air were: 0.275 μg/m3 for sulfate, 6.5 ng/m3 for ammonium, sufficient for most ambient air monitoring applications.

[1]  J. O'Dell.  METHOD 375.2 – DETERMINATION OF SULFATE BY AUTOMATED COLORIMETRY , 1996 .

[2]  Jennifer R. Kryskalla,et al.  Colorimetric Determination of Nitrate Plus Nitrite in Water by Enzymatic Reduction, Automated Discrete Analyzer Methods , 2014 .

[3]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Continuous Automated Measurement of the Soluble Fraction of Atmospheric Particulate Matter , 1995 .

[4]  B. R. Appel,et al.  Artifact particulate sulfate and nitrate formation on filter media , 1984 .

[5]  J. O'Dell.  METHOD 350.1 – DETERMINATION OF AMMONIA NITROGEN BY SEMI-AUTOMATED COLORIMETRY , 1996 .

[6]  Allen L. Robinson,et al.  Positive and Negative Artifacts in Particulate Organic Carbon Measurements with Denuded and Undenuded Sampler Configurations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[7]  Rodney J. Weber,et al.  A Particle-into-Liquid Collector for Rapid Measurement of Aerosol Bulk Chemical Composition , 2001 .

[8]  C. Dutcher,et al.  A review of microfluidic concepts and applications for atmospheric aerosol science , 2018 .

[9]  G. P. Wyers,et al.  THE STEAM-JET AEROSOL COLLECTOR , 1995 .

[10]  Daniel Puiu Poenar,et al.  Microfluidic and Micromachined/MEMS Devices for Separation, Discrimination and Detection of Airborne Particles for Pollution Monitoring , 2019, Micromachines.

[11]  Jan Willem Erisman,et al.  Instrument development and application in studies and monitoring of ambient ammonia , 2001 .

[12]  K. Willeke,et al.  IMPACTOR DESIGN , 2002 .

[13]  Robert B. Mellor,et al.  Reduction of nitrate and nitrite in water by immobilized enzymes , 1992, Nature.

[14]  P. Campíns-Falcó,et al.  A guide for selecting the most appropriate method for ammonium determination in water analysis , 2006 .

[15]  Jungho Hwang,et al.  Integrated particle detection chip for environmental monitoring. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[16]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[17]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Investigation of organic aerosol sampling artifacts in the los angeles basin , 1994 .

[18]  J. Adamski,et al.  Application of the methylthymol blue sulfate method to water and wastewater analysis , 1975 .

[19]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer , 2003 .

[20]  J. Huntzicker,et al.  Vapor adsorption artifact in the sampling of organic aerosol: Face velocity effects , 1986 .

[21]  Jack Zhou,et al.  Chemical and Biological Applications of Digital-Microfluidic Devices , 2007, IEEE Design & Test of Computers.

[22]  R. Fair,et al.  Quantitative measurements of inorganic analytes on a digital microfluidics platform , 2019 .

[23]  Min Hu,et al.  The continuous analysis of nitrate and ammonium in aerosols by the steam jet aerosol collector (SJAC): extension and validation of the methodology , 2001 .

[24]  B. Damit.  Droplet-based microfluidics detector for bioaerosol detection , 2017 .

[25]  Richard B. Fair,et al.  Integrated chemical/biochemical sample collection, pre-concentration, and analysis on a digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platform , 2004, SPIE Optics East.

[26]  R. J. Murphy,et al.  Flow-Injection And Photometric-Determination Of Sulfate In Rainwater With Methylthymol Blue , 1981 .

[27]  Hugh Coe,et al.  Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer 1. Techniques of data interpretation and error analysis , 2003 .