Employee voice and organizational performance: Team versus representative influence

This article explores the effects of team voice and worker representative voice, as well as their interaction, on labor productivity. We examine team voice in terms of team influence on key work-related issues and representative voice via the degree of worker representatives’ influence on multiple collective voice issues. We thus build on the European tradition of examining both direct and indirect voice and their implications for valued organizational outcomes. We find that neither type of voice bears a significant relationship to labor productivity when examined solely but that team voice significantly contributes to enhanced worker efficiency when considered in conjunction with representative voice. In examining the interaction of the two types of voice, we find that a combination of low team and low representative voice leads to inferior labor efficiency compared to other conditions. We also find a negative interaction between team voice and worker representative voice, supporting an interpretation that these types of voice do not complement each other with respect to worker productivity. The positive impact of each type of voice is significantly stronger at low levels of the other type of voice.

[1]  Ronald S. Warren,et al.  The effect of unionization on labor productivity: Some additional evidence , 1988 .

[2]  John J. Lafkas,et al.  Opening the Box: Information Technology, Work Practices, and Wages , 2003 .

[3]  C. Doucouliagos.  Worker Participation and Productivity in Labor-Managed and Participatory Capitalist Firms: A Meta-Analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[5]  John Kelly,et al.  Does Job Re-Design Theory Explain Job Re-Design Outcomes? , 1992 .

[6]  James L. Medoff,et al.  What Do Unions Do , 1986 .

[7]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  What's Driving the New Economy?: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation , 2000 .

[8]  Paul Osterman,et al.  Work Reorganization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Effects on Employee Welfare , 2000 .

[9]  Tony Dundon,et al.  The meanings and purpose of employee voice , 2004 .

[10]  Gaston Cholette,et al.  Industrial and Labor Relations review , 1949 .

[11]  Christina A. Douglas,et al.  Power and Participation in the Workplace , 2000 .

[12]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, and QWL Programs: An Interplant Analysis , 1983 .

[13]  Jed DeVaro.  The Effects of Self-Managed and Closely Managed Teams on Labor Productivity and Product Quality: An Empirical Analysis of a Cross-Section of Establishments , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  Alexander J. S. Colvin,et al.  Employee Voice, Human Resource Practices, and Quit Rates: Evidence from the Telecommunications Industry , 2002 .

[15]  J. Fiorito.  Human resource management practices and worker desires for union representation , 2001 .

[16]  Alex Bryson,et al.  Managerial Responsiveness to Union and Nonunion Worker Voice in Britain , 2004 .

[17]  Frank Heller.  Influence at Work: A 25-Year Program of Research , 1998 .

[18]  B. Cooper,et al.  A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Employee Voice Arrangements in Australia , 2006 .

[19]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[20]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[21]  Stephen Wood,et al.  High commitment management and unionization in the UK , 1996 .

[22]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[23]  Union Voice , 2003 .

[24]  David Metcalf,et al.  Participation, contingent pay, representation and workplace performance: evidence from Great Britain , 1995 .

[25]  Ann C. Frost.  Explaining Variation in Workplace Restructuring: The Role of Local Union Capabilities , 2000 .

[26]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[27]  William N. Cooke.  Product Quality Improvement through Employee Participation: The Effects of Unionization and Joint Union-Management Administration , 1992 .

[28]  Takao Kato,et al.  The Productivity Effects of Participatory Employment Practices: Evidence from New Japanese Panel Data , 2002 .

[29]  R. Markey.  Introduction: global patterns of participation , 2001 .

[30]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Outcomes of Autonomous Workgroups: A Long-Term Field Experiment , 1986 .

[31]  William N. Cooke.  Employee Participation Programs, Group-Based Incentives, and Company Performance: A Union-Nonunion Comparison , 1994 .

[32]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  What Makes Teams Take? Employee Reactions to Work Reforms , 2002 .

[33]  Yuan Cheng,et al.  Restructuring the Employment Relationship , 1998 .

[34]  A. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States , 1971 .

[35]  K. Koike.  Japan's Industrial Relations , 1978 .

[36]  B. Hirsch.  What do unions do for economic performance? , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[37]  W. J. Bigoness,et al.  Leadership and Innovation among Teams , 1997 .

[38]  David Metcalf,et al.  Unions and Productivity, Financial Performance and Investment: International Evidence , 2002 .

[39]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[40]  B. Wilpert,et al.  Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: a critical evaluation. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[41]  Seth R. Silver,et al.  Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction , 2004 .

[42]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  The Road to Root Cause: Shop-Floor Problem-Solving at Three Auto Assembly Plants , 1997 .

[43]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Toward a Systems Theory of Motivated Behavior in Work Teams , 2006 .

[44]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices , 1996 .

[45]  David Beale,et al.  Driven by Nissan?: A Critical Guide to the New Management Techniques , 1994 .

[46]  Mark T. Gilderhus.  The second century , 1999 .

[47]  Hristos Doucouliagos,et al.  What Do Unions Do to Productivity? A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[48]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[49]  P. Gollan.  Twin Tracks - Employee Representation at Eurotunnel Revisited , 2006 .

[50]  S. Machin,et al.  Human Resource Management as a Substitute for Trade Unions in British Workplaces , 2005 .

[51]  Mick Marchington,et al.  Employee Voice Systems , 2008 .

[52]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[53]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  The Transformation of American Industrial Relations , 1988 .

[54]  S. Seibert.  TAKING EMPOWERMENT TO THE NEXT LEVEL : A MULTIPLE-LEVEL MODEL OF EMPOWERMENT , PERFORMANCE , AND SATISFACTION , 2004 .

[55]  D. Levine.  Participation, Productivity, and the Firm's Environment , 1990 .

[56]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[57]  D. Vollrath,et al.  Employee Participation: Diverse Forms and Different Outcomes , 1988 .

[58]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Impact of Work Teams on Manufacturing Performance: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996 .

[59]  James L. Medoff,et al.  Trade Unions in the Production Process , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.