Geobrowsing Behaviour in Google Earth – A semantic Video Content Analysis of On-screen Navigation

In this paper, a semantic approach to the analysis of the recorded on-screen navigation within virtual globes is presented. The research question addressed is which specific geovisual browsing patterns can be identified during the use of Google Earth. In order to explore and visualize geobrowsing behaviour systematically, we have developed a novel system for the analysis of Google Earth tours, called Videana. The software’s functionality comprises the detection of ‘text bubbles’, the visualization of dominant/average colour values, and the allocation of ‘virtual camera’ movements. Based on a multiple case study this paper demonstrates that on-screen navigation behaviour is largely defined by the morphology of the landscape and, to a lesser extent, by the navigational aids and the additional multimedia information provided. Top view and orientation towards True North are most often retained. Users generally prefer satellite views rich in contrast where they can identify map contours. Thus, an established form of map use exists that has also been applied to

[1]  Menno-Jan Kraak,et al.  Geobrowsing: Creative Thinking and Knowledge Discovery Using Geographic Visualization , 2002 .

[2]  G. Gartner Web Mapping 2.0 , 2009 .

[3]  Bernd Freisleben,et al.  A text detection, localization and segmentation system for OCR in images , 2004, IEEE Sixth International Symposium on Multimedia Software Engineering.

[4]  Bernd Freisleben,et al.  Multimodal Video Concept Detection via Bag of Auditory Words and Multiple Kernel Learning , 2012, MMM.

[5]  Jakob Linaa Jensen,et al.  Augmentation of Space: Four Dimensions of Spatial Experiences of Google Earth , 2010 .

[6]  R. Rowles Perception of Perspective Block Diagrams , 1978 .

[7]  Bernd Freisleben,et al.  Videana: A Software Toolkit for Scientific Film Studies , 2009, Digital Tools in Media Studies.

[8]  R. Weale Vision. A Computational Investigation Into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. David Marr , 1983 .

[9]  Richard J Phillips Experimental Method In Cartographic Communication: Research On Relief Maps , 1984 .

[10]  Bernhard Jenny,et al.  Cartography Meets Gaming: Navigating Globes, Block Diagrams and 2D Maps with Gamepads and Joysticks , 2010 .

[11]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  11 – FORM PERCEPTION AND ATTENTION: Striate Cortex and Beyond , 1990 .

[12]  Bernd Freisleben,et al.  Unsupervised Detection of Gradual Video Shot Changes with Motion-Based False Alarm Removal , 2009, ACIVS.

[13]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  William Cartwright,et al.  Delivering geospatial information with Web 2.0 , 2008 .

[15]  Josie Wernecke The KML Handbook: Geographic Visualization for the Web , 2008 .

[16]  William Cartwright Applying the Theatre Metaphor to Integrated Media for Depicting Geography , 2009 .

[17]  Tumasch Reichenbacher,et al.  The Role of Relevance and Cognition in Attention-guiding Geovisualisation , 2008 .

[18]  Heidrun Schumann,et al.  Space, time and visual analytics , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  David Fairbairn,et al.  Measuring Map Complexity , 2006 .

[20]  Bernd Freisleben,et al.  Self-Supervised Learning of Face Appearances in TV Casts and Movies , 2006, Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM'06).

[21]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  How Maps Work - Representation, Visualization, and Design , 1995 .

[22]  Michael W. Jones Vanishing Point: Spatial Composition and the Virtual Camera , 2007 .