Academic Dishonesty Prevention in E-learning University System

This article shows the ways of prevention academic dishonesty in e-learning. We reveal this phenomenon as a complex social notion in the context of the sociology of communication and the Internet and educational data mining. The main categories of academic dishonesty are considered in the paper: cheating, plagiarism and collusion. Cheating is shown in details because it is associated with the tests during the e-learning course. The authors carried out a substantial analysis of academic dishonesty in e-learning and it’s prevention using more than 50 examples covering the experience of various countries and higher education systems. The most interesting case shows measures preventing extension for Google Chrome PolyTestHelper. The main conclusion of the study proves the priority of preventive measures. It is obvious that the problem of cheating cannot be solved purely technically, since a technical war can last forever. At the present stage of information and communication technologies widespread usage a situation of prohibition or significant restrictions in e-learning environment may seem contrived to students. False results of anti-cheat programs can seriously undermine the trust between students and teachers. The ideal way to prevent academic dishonesty is to perform tasks including creative academic elements. Nevertheless, this way is not universal because these are mass courses with a regular enrollment of several thousand students, with a fully automatic verification of academic results.

[1]  N. Almazova,et al.  The Integration of Online and Offline Education in the System of Students’ Preparation for Global Academic Mobility , 2018 .

[2]  Harvey Mellar,et al.  Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: teachers’ perspectives , 2018 .

[3]  Influence of the educational environment on students’ managerial competence , 2019, E3S Web of Conferences.

[4]  Jeremy B. Williams,et al.  Closed book, invigilated exams versus open book, open web exams: An empirical analysis , 2007 .

[5]  Bridget D. Arend Encouraging Critical Thinking in Online Threaded Discussions. , 2009 .

[6]  A. I. Chuchalin,et al.  Engineering Education in the Epoch of Industrial Revolution and Digital Economy , 2018, Higher Education in Russia.

[7]  Gary Pavela Applying the Power of Association on Campus: A Model Code of Academic Integrity , 1997 .

[8]  Social and educational environment modeling in future vision: infosphere tools , 2019, E3S Web of Conferences.

[9]  Jong-Chao Hong,et al.  STEM in Fashion Design: The Roles of Creative Self-Efficacy and Epistemic Curiosity in Creative Performance , 2019, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.

[10]  M. Hosny,et al.  Attitude of Students Towards Cheating and Plagiarism: University Case Study , 2014 .

[11]  Ina Blau,et al.  The ethical dissonance in digital and non-digital learning environments: Does technology promotes cheating among middle school students? , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Yehuda Peled,et al.  Predictors of Academic Dishonesty among undergraduate students in online and face-to-face courses , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[13]  E. Razinkina,et al.  Student satisfaction as an element of education quality monitoring in innovative higher education institution , 2018 .

[14]  Ina Blau,et al.  White-collar crime in academia: Trends in digital academic dishonesty over time and their effect on penalty severity , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Ирина Григорьевна Шестакова TO THE QUESTION OF THE LIMITS OF PROGRESS: IS SINGULARITY POSSIBLE? , 2018 .

[16]  Lourdes Guàrdia,et al.  Trends and Challenges of E-Assessment to Enhance Student Learning in Higher Education , 2020, Learning and Performance Assessment.

[17]  Joe Kerkvliet,et al.  Academic Honesty and Online Courses , 2006 .

[18]  I. Berezovskaya,et al.  Personal intellectual potential in the e-culture conditions , 2018 .

[19]  N. Pokrovskaia,et al.  Diagnostics of Professional Competencies and Motivation of the Engineer in the Knowledge Economy , 2018, 2018 Third International Conference on Human Factors in Complex Technical Systems and Environments (ERGO)s and Environments (ERGO).

[20]  Ingrid Noguera,et al.  Assuring Authorship and Authentication Across the e-Assessment Process , 2016, TEA.

[21]  A. Lathrop,et al.  Student Cheating and Plagiarism in the Internet Era: A Wake-Up Call , 2000 .

[22]  A. Kobicheva,et al.  Evaluation of Students’ Engagement in Integrated Learning Model in A Blended Environment , 2019, Education Sciences.

[23]  Laurent Moccozet,et al.  A versatile and flexible e-assessment framework towards more authentic summative examinations in higher-education , 2019 .

[24]  Russell Baker,et al.  DEMOGRAPHICS OF DIGITAL CHEATING: WHO CHEATS, AND WHAT WE CAN DO ABOUT IT! , 2006 .

[25]  K. Ahmed Student Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty in a Private Middle Eastern University , 2018 .

[26]  Y. Waghid,et al.  On the polemic of academic integrity in higher education , 2019, South African Journal of Higher Education.

[27]  George Watson,et al.  Cheating in the Digital Age: Do students cheat more in on-line courses? , 2008 .