Addressing stakeholder complexity and major pitfalls in large cultural building projects

Abstract Many countries have put substantial investment into constructing large and iconic cultural buildings because they are the emblems of civic pride, as well as tools to generalize cultural and economic benefits. However, stories of project failures are often heard in this rapid cultural building boom. In fact, many pitfalls in developing large cultural building projects (CBPs) are associated to the stakeholders since they are the actual central figures of a project. As such, addressing stakeholder complexity and understanding major pitfalls in CBPs from stakeholder perspective are crucial to the successful management of these projects, yet relevant empirical studies remain lacking. To fill this gap, case study of a large performing arts center was conducted. A holistic stakeholder analysis approach, which applies both rationalistic methods (e.g. social network analysis) and empirical methods (e.g. survey and interviews), was adopted to address stakeholder complexity in the case. Three major pitfalls in large CBPs were identified, including ‘developing accurate end users' requirements’, ‘balancing between aesthetics, functionality and resources’, and ‘leadership team makeup, vision, charisma and learning stance’. Their underlying causes and possible solutions were discussed. This study contributes theoretically by illustrating a holistic approach of analyzing and addressing stakeholder complexity, and provides practical value by understanding the pitfalls of CBPs from stakeholder perspective.

[1]  Stefan Olander,et al.  Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management , 2007 .

[2]  Jacob L. Moreno,et al.  The Sociometry Reader. , 1961 .

[3]  Beverly Pasian,et al.  Online Stakeholder Interactions in the Early Stage of a Megaproject , 2015 .

[4]  Coleen Vogel,et al.  Heads or tails? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management , 2005 .

[5]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[6]  Shyh-Chyang Lin,et al.  An Analysis for Construction Engineering Networks , 2015 .

[7]  Lynda M. Bourne,et al.  Project Relationship Management and the Stakeholder Circle , 2010 .

[8]  Christopher M. Weible,et al.  An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy , 2006 .

[9]  Lynda M. Bourne,et al.  A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement , 2011 .

[10]  Anna Lund Jepsen,et al.  Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world , 2009 .

[11]  A. Gupta,et al.  A stakeholder analysis approach for interorganizational systems , 1995 .

[12]  Andrew Crane,et al.  Are You Talking to Me? Stakeholder Communication and the Risks and Rewards of Dialogue , 2003 .

[13]  Pamela Baxter,et al.  Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers , 2008 .

[14]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[15]  David de Vaus,et al.  Research Design in Social Research , 2001 .

[16]  Adedeji B. Badiru,et al.  Project Management Body of Knowledge , 2016 .

[17]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[18]  Winston Tellis,et al.  Introduction to Case Study , 1997 .

[19]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[20]  H. Doloi,et al.  Assessment of social sustainability in construction projects using social network analysis , 2015 .

[21]  R. Stake Qualitative Case Studies. , 2005 .

[22]  Borko Furht,et al.  Handbook of Social Network Technologies and Applications , 2010, Handbook of Social Network Technologies.

[23]  Andrew Parker,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations , 2004 .

[24]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[25]  Chris McMahon,et al.  Analysing sustainable development social structures in an international civil engineering consultancy , 2012 .

[26]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[27]  Dulcy M. Abraham,et al.  Hybrid Approach to the Study of Inter-Organization High Performance Teams , 2013 .

[28]  R. Brugha,et al.  A stakeholder analysis. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[29]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[30]  Sevgi Zeynep Dogan,et al.  Assessing coordination performance based on centrality in an e-mail communication network , 2015 .

[31]  Raya Fidel,et al.  The case study method: a case study , 1984 .

[32]  Stephen Pryke,et al.  Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis , 2004 .

[33]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[34]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[35]  R. Newcombe,et al.  From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach , 2003 .

[36]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[37]  R. Yang,et al.  An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: empirical or rationalistic perspectives , 2014 .

[38]  J. Mitchell,et al.  The Concept and Use of Social Networks , 1969 .

[39]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[40]  M. A. Beauchamp AN IMPROVED INDEX OF CENTRALITY. , 1965, Behavioral science.

[41]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Conflict or consensus: An investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong , 2012 .

[42]  Anthony Finkelstein,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Software Engineering, Manuscript Id Stakerare: Using Social Networks and Collaborative Filtering for Large-scale Requirements Elicitation , 2022 .

[43]  Rebecca J. Yang,et al.  Modelling stakeholder-associated risk networks in green building projects , 2016 .

[44]  Liaquat Hossain,et al.  Communications and coordination in construction projects , 2009 .

[45]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  Social Network Model of Construction , 2008 .

[46]  Margaret K.Y. Mok,et al.  Schedule risks in prefabrication housing production in Hong Kong: a social network analysis , 2016 .