Comparison of embodied energies of Ordinary Portland Cement with Bayer-derived geopolymer products

It has been shown that silicate-derived geopolymers can be manufactured with lower greenhouse gas emissions than can Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). This is assuming that transport methods and distances are equal. In this paper, we have used published and newly-determined data, following closely with accepted life cycle assessment procedures, to evaluate the embodied energy of a new class of geopolymers, namely Bayer-derived geopolymers. These geopolymers utilise concentrated sodium aluminate solutions (Bayer liquor) with fly ash and other aluminosilicates to form geopolymers. Significantly, utilising this combination of industrial by-products can dramatically lower the embodied energy of Bayer-derived geopolymer. Under current industrial operations, Bayer liquor is recycled into the process after intensive treatment, in order to retain alumina and caustic soda however, under alternative configurations this impurity-laden stream could be removed, potentially enhancing environmental performance of both geopolymer and alumina production. In a reconfigured-system, with no allocation of embodied energy to the Bayer waste stream, this could reduce the embodied energy of the derived geopolymer concrete to as little as 0.33 GJ/t. Embodied energies of between 6 and 33% of those associated with OPC have been achieved depending on the process configuration and allocation assumptions used. Most importantly, such assessment indicates that for the first time, Bayer-derived geopolymer binders could be produced with embodied energy intensity at levels comparable to manufactured or recycled sand, gravel and stone.

[1]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials , 2008 .

[2]  Benjamin C. McLellan,et al.  Renewable energy in the minerals industry: a review of global potential , 2012 .

[3]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies , 2003 .

[4]  D. Huntzinger,et al.  A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies , 2009 .

[5]  L. Wacker,et al.  Thallium as a tracer for preindustrial volcanic eruptions in an ice core record from Illimani, Bolivia. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  J. W. P. and,et al.  Characterization of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymeric Binders Activated with Sodium Aluminate , 2002 .

[7]  A. V. Riessen,et al.  Bayer-geopolymers: An exploration of synergy between the alumina and geopolymer industries , 2013 .

[8]  Liza O'moore,et al.  Impact of fly ash content and fly ash transportation distance on embodied greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption in concrete , 2009 .

[9]  Jonathan M Cullen,et al.  Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Keun-Hyeok Yang,et al.  Assessment of CO2 reduction of alkali-activated concrete , 2013 .

[11]  Jamie Goggins,et al.  The assessment of embodied energy in typical reinforced concrete building structures in Ireland , 2010 .

[12]  V. Buyanov BP: Statistical Review of World Energy 2011 , 2011 .

[13]  J. Davidovits PROPERTIES OF GEOPOLYMER CEMENTS , 1994 .

[14]  G. Corder,et al.  Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement , 2011 .

[15]  Anja Buchwald,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of geopolymers , 2009 .

[16]  John L. Provis,et al.  Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement , 2012 .

[17]  Nawshad Haque,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations , 2010 .

[18]  Aie,et al.  Tracking Industrial Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions , 2007 .

[19]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[20]  Sarah J. Wakes,et al.  The relationship between total embodied energy and cost of commercial buildings , 2012 .

[21]  W. Langer,et al.  Sustainability of aggregates in construction , 2009 .

[22]  P. Van den Heede,et al.  Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations , 2012 .