Assessing Costs and Benefits of Measures to Achieve Good Environmental Status in European Regional Seas: Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learnt

The EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) requires Member States to assess the costs and benefits of Programmes of Measures (PoMs) put in place to ensure that European marine waters achieve Good Environmental Status by 2020. An interdisciplinary approach is needed to carry out such an assessment whereby economic analysis is used to evaluate the outputs from ecological analysis that determines the expected effects of such management measures. This paper applies and tests an existing six-step approach to assess costs and benefits of management measures with potential to support the overall goal of the MSFD and discusses a range of ecological and economic analytical tools applicable to this task. Environmental cost-benefit analyses are considered for selected PoMs in three European case studies: Baltic Sea (Finland), East Coast Marine Plan area (UK) and the Bay of Biscay (Spain). These contrasting case studies are used to investigate the application of environmental cost-benefit analysis including the challenges, opportunities and lessons learnt from using this approach. This paper demonstrates that there are opportunities in applying the six-step environmental cost-benefit analysis framework presented to assess the impact of PoMs. However, given demonstrated limitations of knowledge and data availability, application of other economic techniques should also be considered (although not applied here) to complement the more formal environmental cost-benefit analysis approach.

[1]  G. Mace,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Jonathan P. Atkins,et al.  Marine ecosystem services: Linking indicators to their classification , 2015 .

[3]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Integrating natural and social sciences to manage sustainably vectors of change in the marine environment: Dogger Bank transnational case study , 2015 .

[4]  J. Wiktor,et al.  Assessing Non-market Benefits of Seagrass Restoration in the Gulf of Gdańsk , 2018 .

[5]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Predicting the effects of marine climate change on the invertebrate prey of the birds of rocky shores , 2004 .

[6]  M. Hufnagl,et al.  Projecting changes in the distribution and productivity of living marine resources: A critical review of the suite of modelling approaches used in the large European project VECTORS , 2016 .

[7]  Maria Noring,et al.  Valuation of ecotoxicological impacts from tributyltin based on a quantitative environmental assessment framework , 2016, Ambio.

[8]  Marc Alvarez.  Chapter 2 – Conceptual framework , 2007 .

[9]  Lassi Ahlvik,et al.  Cost-Effective Marine Protection - A Pragmatic Approach , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  Aoife Foley,et al.  The evolution of offshore wind power in the United Kingdom , 2014 .

[11]  A. Hawkins,et al.  Information gaps in understanding the effects of noise on fishes and invertebrates , 2015, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[12]  F. Fahy,et al.  Developing a Comparative Marine Socio-Economic Framework for the European Atlantic Area , 2015 .

[13]  Muammar Qaddafi,et al.  The Green Book , 1975 .

[14]  N. Hanley,et al.  Economic valuation of marine and coastal ecosystems:Is it currently fit for purpose? , 2014 .

[15]  Marnie L Campbell,et al.  Classification of Non-Indigenous Species Based on Their Impacts: Considerations for Application in Marine Management , 2015, PLoS biology.

[16]  Frank A. Ward,et al.  Valuing Nature with Travel Cost Models , 2000 .

[17]  E Ferguson,et al.  From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. , 2006, Environment international.

[18]  P. White,et al.  Anthropogenic sources of underwater sound can modify how sediment-dwelling invertebrates mediate ecosystem properties , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Jonathan P. Atkins,et al.  Identification of a Practicable Set of Ecosystem Indicators for Coastal and Marine Ecosystem Services , 2015 .

[20]  J. Hirschfeld,et al.  Economic valuation of Baltic marine ecosystem services: blind spots and limited consistency , 2016 .

[21]  S. Hynes,et al.  Valuing the non-market benefits arising from the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive , 2014 .

[22]  C. Duarte,et al.  Marine biodiversity and ecosystem services: an elusive link. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[23]  Jennifer L. Molnar,et al.  Assessing the global threat of invasive species to marine biodiversity , 2008 .

[24]  J. Godfrey.  Defining and classifying , 2017 .

[25]  R. Crilly,et al.  Small versus large-scale, multi-fleet fisheries: The case for economic, social and environmental access criteria in European fisheries , 2013 .

[26]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Analyzing Beach Recreationists’ Preferences for the Reduction of Jellyfish Blooms: Economic Results from a Stated-Choice Experiment in Catalonia, Spain , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[28]  S. Simpson,et al.  Size-dependent physiological responses of shore crabs to single and repeated playback of ship noise , 2013, Biology Letters.

[29]  B. Würsig,et al.  Development of an air bubble curtain to reduce underwater noise of percussive piling. , 2000, Marine environmental research.

[30]  Jeremy Nedwell,et al.  Assessment of sub-sea acoustic noise and vibration from offshore wind turbines and its impact on marine wildlife initial measurements of underwater noise during construction of offshore windfarms and comparison with background noise , 2004 .

[31]  Berit Hasler,et al.  Marine Ecosystem Services , 2016 .

[32]  Nathalie Niquil,et al.  Using ecological models to assess ecosystem status in support of the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive , 2015 .

[33]  I. Gren.  Pricing Nature, Cost--Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy , 2010 .

[34]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[35]  A. Occhipinti,et al.  Alien Species Alert: Rapana venosa (veined whelk) , 2004 .

[36]  Brigitte Schulte-Fortkamp,et al.  Exploring Our Sonic Environment Through Soundscape Research & Theory , 2014 .

[37]  Anthony D. Hawkins,et al.  Asessing the Impact of Underwater sounds on fishes and other forms of Marine life , 2014 .

[38]  R. Lind,et al.  Intertemporal Equity, Discounting, and Economic Efficiency in Water Policy Evaluation , 1997 .

[39]  Keith M. Cooper,et al.  Seabed Restoration following marine aggregate dredging: Do the benefits justify the costs? MEPF-MALSF Project 09-P115. MALSF Lowestoft. 111pp. ISBN 978 0 907545 64 4. , 2011 .

[40]  A. D. Robertis,et al.  Fish avoidance of research vessels and the efficacy of noise-reduced vessels: a review , 2013 .

[41]  J. Fernández-Macho,et al.  Measuring the maritime economy: Spain in the European Atlantic Arc , 2015 .

[42]  M. Feldstein.  The Social Time Preference Discount Rate in Cost Benefit Analysis , 1964 .

[43]  M. Lehtiniemi,et al.  Ten recommendations for advancing the assessment and management of non-indigenous species in marine ecosystems , 2014 .

[44]  R. D. de Groot,et al.  Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[45]  Eduard Interwies,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis in the context of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive: The case of Germany , 2014 .

[46]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century , 2010, Science.

[47]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[48]  A. Kosenius,et al.  Ecosystem benefits from coastal habitats—A three-country choice experiment , 2015 .

[49]  Li Wang,et al.  Corrigendum: The Serum Profile of Hypercytokinemia Factors Identified in H7N9-Infected Patients can Predict Fatal Outcomes , 2016, Scientific reports.

[50]  S C Lockwood,et al.  IMPACT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES: THE ROLE OF THE NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE IN THE EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS , 1977 .

[51]  Julia Martin-Ortega,et al.  Classifying Ecosystem Services for Economic Valuation: The case of forest water services , 2010 .

[52]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[53]  J. Herriges,et al.  The measurement of environmental and resource values : theory and methods , 2014 .

[54]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Marine biodiversity and ecosystem function relationships: The potential for practical monitoring applications , 2015 .

[55]  Christine Bertram,et al.  On the environmental effectiveness of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive , 2013 .

[56]  A. Murillas-Maza,et al.  The value of open ocean ecosystems: A case study for the Spanish exclusive economic zone , 2011 .

[57]  A. Huhtala,et al.  Policy Goals for Improved Water Quality in the Baltic Sea: When do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs? , 2015 .

[58]  J. Dauvin,et al.  Hemigrapsus sanguineus (De Haan, 1835) (Crustacea: Brachyura: Grapsoidea) a new invasive species in European waters: the case of the French English Channel coast (2008-2010). , 2011 .

[59]  J. A. Fernandes,et al.  Costs and benefits to European shipping of ballast-water and hull-fouling treatment: Impacts of native and non-indigenous species , 2016 .

[60]  R. Costanza,et al.  Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making , 2009 .

[61]  Georg Nehls,et al.  Assessment and costs of potential engineering solutions for the mitigation of the impacts of underwater noise arising from the construction of offshore windfarms , 2007 .

[62]  D. Pearce,et al.  Cost?Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy , 1998 .

[63]  Berit Hasler,et al.  Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea – a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states , 2014 .

[64]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Incorporating ecosystem services in marine planning: The role of valuation , 2014 .

[65]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation , 2015 .

[66]  Sarah J Dolman,et al.  Navy sonar and cetaceans: just how much does the gun need to smoke before we act? , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[67]  Anthony D. Hawkins,et al.  A sound approach to assessing the impact of underwater noise on marine fishes and invertebrates , 2017 .

[68]  N. Hanley.  Cost — Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policymaking , 2001 .

[69]  J. Aronson,et al.  The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity , 2010 .

[70]  Richard T. Carson,et al.  Chapter 17 Contingent Valuation , 2005 .

[71]  P. Tyack,et al.  Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise , 2007 .

[72]  A. Hawkins,et al.  Responses of free-living coastal pelagic fish to impulsive sounds. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.