Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures: Selected topics in the field of geotechnical engineering

The driven monopile is currently the preferred foundation type for most offshore wind farms. Whilst static capacity of the monopile is important, a safe design must also address issues of accumulated rotation and changes in stiffness after long-term cyclic loading. Design guidance on this issue is limited. To address this, a series of laboratory tests were conducted where a stiff pile in drained sand was subjected to between 8000 and 60000 cycles of combined moment and horizontal loading. A typical design for an offshore wind turbine monopile was used as a basis for the study, to ensure that pile dimensions and loading ranges were realistic. A complete non-dimensional framework for stiff piles in sand is presented and applied to interpret the test results. The accumulated rotation was found to be dependent on relative density and was strongly affected by the characteristics of the applied cyclic load. Particular loading characteristics were found to cause a significant increase in the accummulated rotation. The pile stiffness increased with number of cycles, which contrasts with the current methodology where static load-displacement curves are degraded to account for cyclic loading. Methods are presented to predict the change in stiffness and the accumulated rotation of a stiff pile due to long-term cyclic loading. The use of the methods developed is demonstrated for a typical full-scale monopile. Paper I

[1]  D. Muir Wood,et al.  A kinematic hardening constitutive model for sands: the multiaxial formulation , 1999 .

[2]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  A critical-state constitutive model for liquefiable sand , 2005 .

[3]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  Plastic Internal Variables Formalism of Cyclic Plasticity , 1976 .

[4]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  Dilatancy for cohesionless soils , 2000 .

[5]  Majid T. Manzari,et al.  SANICLAY: simple anisotropic clay plasticity model , 2006 .

[6]  A. Schofield,et al.  On The Yielding of Soils , 1958 .

[7]  Richard Wan,et al.  A simple constitutive model for granular soils: Modified stress-dilatancy approach , 1998 .

[8]  Lars Bo Ibsen.  The Mechanism Controlling Static Liquefaction and Cyclic Strength of Sand , 1998 .

[9]  Juan Manuel Pestana-Nascimento.  A unified constitutive model for clays and sands , 1994 .

[10]  A. Casagrande,et al.  Characteristics of cohesionless soils affecting the stability of slopes and earth fills , 1940 .

[11]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Physics of Liquefaction Phenomena around Marine Structures , 2006 .

[12]  Steen Krenk,et al.  Characteristic state plasticity for granular materials Part II: Model calibration and results , 2000 .

[13]  F. Tatsuoka,et al.  Undrained Deformation and Liquefaction of Sand under Cyclic Stresses , 1975 .

[14]  Lars Bo Ibsen,et al.  The Role of the Characteristic Line in Static Soil Behavior , 1998 .

[15]  Mike Jefferies,et al.  NOR-SAND: A SIMPLE CRITICAL STATE MODEL FOR SAND , 1993 .

[16]  Lars Bo Ibsen,et al.  The Danish Rigid Boundary True Triaxial Apparatus for Soil Testing , 2002 .

[17]  Mahdi Taiebat,et al.  Study of pore pressure variation during liquefaction using two constitutive models for sand , 2007 .

[18]  Michael Ortiz,et al.  A unified approach to finite deformation elastoplastic analysis based on the use of hyperelastic constitutive equations , 1985 .

[19]  Yannis F. Dafalias,et al.  Unified critical-state bounding-surface plasticity model for soil , 1994 .

[20]  Majid T. Manzari,et al.  On integration of a cyclic soil plasticity model , 2001 .

[21]  Ken Been,et al.  A STATE PARAMETER FOR SANDS , 1985 .

[22]  Steen Krenk,et al.  Family of Invariant Stress Surfaces , 1996 .

[23]  G. Gudehus,et al.  Deformation and Progressive Failure in Geomechanics, , 2002 .

[24]  Poul V. Lade,et al.  Elasto-plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil with curved yield surfaces , 1977 .