Influence of Spatial Variability on Pavement Responses Using Latin Hypercube Sampling on Two-Dimensional Random Fields

Although uncertainties in material properties have been addressed in the design of flexible pavements, most current modeling techniques assume that pavement layers are homogeneous. The paper addresses the influence of the spatial variability of the resilient moduli of pavement layers by evaluating the effect of the variance and correlation length on the pavement responses to loading. The integration of the spatially varying log-normal random field with the finite-difference method has been achieved through an exponential autocorrelation function. The variation in the correlation length was found to have a marginal effect on the mean values of the critical strains and a noticeable effect on the standard deviation which decreases with decreases in correlation length. This reduction in the variance arises because of the spatial averaging phenomenon over the softer and stiffer zones generated because of spatial variability. The increase in the mean value of critical strains with decreasing correlation length, although minor, illustrates that pavement performance is adversely affected by the presence of spatially varying layers. The study also confirmed that the higher the variability in the pavement layer moduli, introduced through a higher value of coefficient of variation (COV), the higher the variability in the pavement response. The study concludes that ignoring spatial variability by modeling the pavement layers as homogeneous that have very short correlation lengths can result in the underestimation of the critical strains and thus an inaccurate assessment of the pavement performance.

[1]  I. Papaioannou,et al.  Reliability updating in geotechnical engineering including spatial variability of soil , 2012 .

[2]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Probabilistic Finite Element Method , 1995 .

[3]  P. Brooker,et al.  INACCURACIES ASSOCIATED WITH ESTIMATING RANDOM MEASUREMENT ERRORS , 1997 .

[4]  António Pereira,et al.  Methods for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis : Review and recomendations for implementation in Ecolego , 2006 .

[5]  Mark J. Thompson,et al.  Power-Based Compaction Monitoring using Vibratory Padfoot Roller , 2006 .

[6]  Philippe L. Bourdeau PROBABILISTIC MODELING OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS , 1990 .

[7]  G. Baecher Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering , 2003 .

[8]  Jianfeng Hua Finite element modeling and analysis of accelerated pavement testing devices and rutting phenomenon , 2000 .

[9]  Ghassan R. Chehab,et al.  New England Verification of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 1-37A Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide , 2012 .

[10]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Bearing-capacity prediction of spatially random c ϕ soils , 2003 .

[11]  A. Olsson,et al.  On Latin Hypercube Sampling for Stochastic Finite Element Analysis , 1999 .

[12]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability , 1988 .

[13]  R. Iman,et al.  A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables , 1982 .

[14]  Wei Wang,et al.  PAVEMENT VARIABILITY AND RELIABILITY , 1998 .

[15]  Robert H. Sues,et al.  Probabilistic Finite-Element Analysis of Airfield Pavements , 1996 .

[16]  Drahomír Novák,et al.  Simulation of random fields for stochastic finite element analyses , 2005 .

[17]  T. Al-Bittar,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of shallow foundations resting on spatially varying soils , 2012 .

[18]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Probabilistic Foundation Settlement on Spatially Random Soil , 2002 .

[19]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Undrained Bearing Capacity of Two-Strip Footings on Spatially Random Soil , 2006 .

[20]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Probabilistic infinite slope analysis , 2011 .

[21]  G. Stefanou The stochastic finite element method: Past, present and future , 2009 .

[22]  Halil Ceylan,et al.  Influence of Subgrade/Subbase Non-Uniformity on PCC Pavement Performance , 2004 .