The helicopter industry is vigorously pursuing development of civil tiltrotors. One key to efficient high speed performance of this rotorcraft is prop-rotor performance. Of equal, if not greater, importance is assurance that the flight envelope is free of aeroelastic instabilities well beyond currently envisioned cuise speeds. This later condition requires study at helical tip Match numbers well in excess of 1.0. Two 1940's 'supersonic' propeller experiments conducted by NACA have provided an immensely valuable data bank with which to study prop-rotor behavior at transonic and supersonic helical tip Mach numbers. Very accurate 'blades alone' data were obtained by using nearly an infinite hub. Tabulated data were recreated from the many thrust and power figures and are included in two Appendices to this report. This data set is exceptionally well suited to re-evaluating classical blade element theories as well as evolving computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analyses. A limited comparison of one propeller's experimental results to a modem rotorcraft CFD code is made. This code, referred to as TURNS, gives very encouraging results. Detailed analysis of the performance data from both propellers is provided in Appendix A. This appendix quantifies the minimum power required to produce usable prop-rotor thrust. The dependence of minimum profile power on Reynolds number is quantified. First order compressibility power losses are quantified as well and a first approximation to design air-foil thickness ratio to avoid compressibility losses is provided. Appendix A's results are applied to study high speed civil tiltrotor cruise performance. Predicted tiltrotor performance is compared to two turboprop commercial transports. The comparison shows that there is no fundamental aerodynamic reason why the rotorcraft industry could not develop civil tiltrotor aircraft which have competitive cruise performance with today's regional, turboprop airlines. Recommendations for future study that will insure efficient prop-rotor performance to well beyond 400 knots are given.
[1]
Melvin M Carmel,et al.
Investigation of the NACA 4-(5)(08)-03 Two-Blade Propeller at Forward Mach Numbers to 0.925
,
1949
.
[2]
James B. Delano.
Investigation of the NACA 4-(5)(08)-03 and NACA 4-(10)(08)-03 Two-Blade Propellers at Forward Mach Numbers to 0.725 to Determine the Effects of Camber and Compressibility on Performance
,
1951
.
[3]
Robert E. Hage,et al.
Airplane Performance, Stability and Control
,
1949
.
[4]
Alfred Gessow,et al.
Aerodynamics of the Helicopter
,
1981
.
[5]
Melvin M. Carmel,et al.
Further investigation of NACA 4-(5)(08)-03 two-blade propeller at high forward speeds
,
1947
.
[6]
Roy D. Hager,et al.
Advanced Turboprop Project
,
1988
.
[7]
John Stack,et al.
Tests of Airfoils Designed to Delay the Compressibility Burble
,
1943
.
[8]
Albert J. Evans,et al.
A wind-tunnel investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of a full-scale supersonic-type three-blade propeller at Mach numbers to 0.96
,
1953
.
[9]
I. H. Abbott,et al.
Theory of Wing Sections
,
1959
.