Localization of the syntactic mismatch negativity in the temporal cortex: An MEG study

Recent auditory oddball studies using syntactic stimuli report a syntactic effect on the mismatch negativity (sMMN) around 100-200 ms. For morphosyntactic violations, this sMMN effect has been localized in the left superior temporal cortex. Independently, a recent visual sentence processing study introduced a "sensory hypothesis" which postulates that sensory cortices are sensitive to syntactic violations when these are overtly marked by closed-class morphemes, and thus contribute to early syntax-related effects in EEG and MEG. The present study aimed to test the sensory hypothesis in the auditory modality by localizing the neuronal sources of the sMMN to phrase structure violations. Using whole head magnetoencephalography, two-word utterances which were syntactically correct, uncommon or incorrect due to a word category violation were presented in an auditory oddball paradigm. In the sMMN time window (100-180 ms), incorrect phrases elicited strongest activation in the left Sylvian fissure (including the primary auditory cortex) and in the left superior temporal sulcus. Prior to this, a very early grammaticality effect (40-80 ms), focused in the left Sylvian fissure, was found. An additional grammaticality effect in a later time window (280-380 ms) was localized in the anterior part of the superior temporal gyrus, the planum polare. Processing of an uncommon phrase did not differ from processing a correct phrase in any of the time windows, indicating the genuinely syntactic nature of the sMMN effect. Our results are in line with previous studies localizing the sMMN to morphosyntactic violations and are furthermore compatible with the sensory hypothesis of closed-class morphology based syntactic processes.

[1]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  D Y von Cramon,et al.  Language related brain potentials in patients with cortical and subcortical left hemisphere lesions. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  A. Friederici,et al.  The brain basis of syntactic processes: functional imaging and lesion studies , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Anna S. Hasting,et al.  Syntax as a reflex: Neurophysiological evidence for early automaticity of grammatical processing , 2008, Brain and Language.

[7]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Grammar or Serial Order?: Discrete Combinatorial Brain Mechanisms Reflected by the Syntactic Mismatch Negativity , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[9]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Language outside the focus of attention: The mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes , 2006, Progress in Neurobiology.

[12]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Determinants of dominance: Is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech? , 2005, NeuroImage.

[13]  M. Kisley,et al.  Comparison of sensory gating to mismatch negativity and self-reported perceptual phenomena in healthy adults. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[14]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Lateralization of auditory sensory gating and neuropsychological dysfunction in schizophrenia. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[17]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[21]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Setting the Stage for Automatic Syntax Processing: The Mismatch Negativity as an Indicator of Syntactic Priming , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  T. R. Knösche,et al.  Processing of Syntactic Information Monitored by Brain Surface Current Density Mapping Based on MEG , 2004, Brain Topography.

[24]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Grammar Processing Outside the Focus of Attention: an MEG Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  Tatsuo Nakamura,et al.  Transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells into the cochlea of chinchillas , 2004, Neuroreport.

[27]  A. Friederici,et al.  Noise affects auditory and linguistic processing differently: an MEG study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[28]  A. Friederici,et al.  Auditory Language Comprehension: An Event-Related fMRI Study on the Processing of Syntactic and Lexical Information , 2000, Brain and Language.

[29]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[30]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[31]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  E. Schröger.  The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing , 2005 .

[33]  S. Palva,et al.  Discrimination of Speech and of Complex Nonspeech Sounds of Different Temporal Structure in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2000, NeuroImage.

[34]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[35]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Language in the Mismatch Negativity Design , 2007 .

[36]  David Poeppel,et al.  Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications , 2004, Neuroreport.

[37]  A. M. Dale,et al.  A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[38]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[40]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Burkhard Maess,et al.  The brain generates its own sentence melody: A Gestalt phenomenon in speech perception , 2003, Brain and Language.

[42]  Guy Dove,et al.  Linking Brainwaves to the Brain: An ERP Primer , 2005, Developmental neuropsychology.

[43]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[44]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[45]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  It's Early: Event-related Potential Evidence for Initial Interaction of Syntax and Prosody in Speech Comprehension , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Temporal integration of auditory information in sensory memory as reflected by the mismatch negativity , 1994, Biological Psychology.

[47]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. , 2006, Psychological review.

[48]  A. Friederici,et al.  Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[49]  S. Taulu,et al.  Suppression of Interference and Artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method , 2003, Brain Topography.

[50]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[51]  S. Taulu,et al.  Applications of the signal space separation method , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[52]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[53]  T. Roberts,et al.  Magnetoencephalography detection of early syntactic processing in humans: comparison between L1 speakers and L2 learners of English , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[54]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain. , 1998, Psychophysiology.