Three-defender versus two-defender systems in football: A comparison of offensive play

Scientific research on tactical formations in football is scarce and the studies that do exist focus on aspects linked to physical conditioning. Therefore, the objective of this work was to analyse offensive play differences between three-centre-back (3CB) and two-centre-back (2CB) formations. A total of 72 matches played by eight LaLiga teams (Spain) during the 2018–19 season were analysed. Four teams used a 3CB system and four teams a 2CB system. Data were obtained from the Opta sports company, and the reports were generated using Mediacoach. Three groups of variables were analysed (passes, possession and finishing). The results showed that both the number of team passes (‘passes received’, ‘passes attempted’) and their effectiveness (‘number’ and % of ‘completed’ passes) were significantly greater ( p < 0.001) in 3CB systems. As far as possession was concerned, 3CB systems obtained a higher percentage ( p = 0.004, ES = 0.45), time average ( p = 0.001, ES = 0.57) and possessions with more than nine passes ( p = 0.000). Finally, regarding the variables relating to attack finishing, the values attained significantly higher levels in the 3CB teams in ‘expected goals’ ( p = 0.020), ‘goals scored’ ( p = 0.030) and ‘probability of a shot being a goal’ ( p = 0.046). It could be concluded that 3CB teams presented greater rates of ball possession and attack finishing.

[1]  A. Woll,et al.  Center backs work hardest when playing in a back three: The influence of tactical formation on physical and technical match performance in professional soccer , 2022, PloS one.

[2]  R. Rein,et al.  Defending in 4-4-2 or 5-3-2 formation? small differences in footballers’ collective tactical behaviours , 2021, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  J. González-Jurado,et al.  Technical-Tactical Performance from Data Providers: A Systematic Review in Regular Football Leagues , 2021, Sustainability.

[4]  A. López-Valenciano,et al.  Association between offensive and defensive playing style variables and ranking position in a national football league , 2021, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  J. Castellano,et al.  A longitudinal analysis of technical-tactical and physical performance of the teams in the Spanish LaLiga Santander: An eight-season study , 2021, Biology of sport.

[6]  D. Sekulić,et al.  Position Specific Running Performances in Professional Football (Soccer): Influence of Different Tactical Formations , 2020, Sports.

[7]  Juan Evaristo Callejas-Jerónimo,et al.  Analysis of the goal-scoring opportunities conceded in football: a study case in the Spanish La Liga , 2020 .

[8]  F. Esposito,et al.  Effect of formation, ball in play and ball possession on peak demands in elite soccer , 2020, Biology of sport.

[9]  Martin Lames,et al.  Football-specific validity of TRACAB’s optical video tracking systems , 2020, PloS one.

[10]  J. González-Jurado,et al.  Análisis de goles recibidos en La Liga: estudio de caso. (Analysis of goals conceded in the Spanish La Liga: case study). , 2020 .

[11]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  A Systematic Review of Collective Tactical Behaviours in Football Using Positional Data , 2019, Sports Medicine.

[12]  Raphael Flepp,et al.  Dealing With Randomness in Match Outcomes: How to Rethink Performance Evaluation in European Club Football Using Expected Goals , 2020 .

[13]  Rodrigo Aquino,et al.  Comparisons of ball possession, match running performance, player prominence and team network properties according to match outcome and playing formation during the 2018 FIFA World Cup , 2019, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport.

[14]  Tomás García-Calvo,et al.  A comparison of a GPS device and a multi-camera video technology during official soccer matches: Agreement between systems , 2019, PloS one.

[15]  V. Armatas,et al.  The creation of goal scoring opportunities in professional soccer. Tactical differences between Spanish La Liga, English Premier League, German Bundesliga and Italian Serie A , 2019, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport.

[16]  A. Rebelo,et al.  A comparison of match-physical demands between different tactical systems: 1-4-5-1 vs 1-3-5-2 , 2019, PloS one.

[17]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  A tactical comparison of the 4-2-3-1 and 3-5-2 formation in soccer: A theory-oriented, experimental approach based on positional data in an 11 vs. 11 game set-up , 2019, PloS one.

[18]  C. Sunderland,et al.  Artificial neural networks and player recruitment in professional soccer , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  K. Davids,et al.  What Performance Analysts Need to Know About Research Trends in Association Football (2012–2016): A Systematic Review , 2018, Sports Medicine.

[20]  Rodrigo Aquino,et al.  Effects of competitive standard, team formation and playing position on match running performance of Brazilian professional soccer players , 2017 .

[21]  J. Sampaio,et al.  The effects of a player dismissal on competitive technical match performance , 2016 .

[22]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  Big data and tactical analysis in elite soccer: future challenges and opportunities for sports science , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[23]  Paul R. Ford,et al.  Attacking and defensive styles of play in soccer: analysis of Spanish and English elite teams , 2016, Journal of sports sciences.

[24]  Hugo Sarmento,et al.  Match analysis in football: a systematic review , 2014, Journal of sports sciences.

[25]  Paul S. Bradley,et al.  Evaluation of Research Using Computerised Tracking Systems (Amisco® and Prozone®) to Analyse Physical Performance in Elite Soccer: A Systematic Review , 2014, Sports Medicine.

[26]  Will G. Hopkins,et al.  Inter-operator reliability of live football match statistics from OPTA Sportsdata , 2013 .

[27]  Karim Chamari,et al.  The effects of a congested fixture period on physical performance, technical activity and injury rate during matches in a professional soccer team , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[28]  Christian Collet,et al.  The possession game? A comparative analysis of ball retention and team success in European and international football, 2007–2010 , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[29]  A. H. Mendo,et al.  Revisión de indicadores de rendimiento en fútbol , 2012 .

[30]  A. Tenga,et al.  Characteristics of goal-scoring possessions in open play: Comparing the top, in-between and bottom teams from professional soccer league , 2011 .

[31]  C. Carling Influence of opposition team formation on physical and skill-related performance in a professional soccer team , 2011 .

[32]  Roald Bahr,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of offensive match-play in professional soccer , 2010 .

[33]  Keith Davids,et al.  Interpersonal Pattern Dynamics and Adaptive Behavior in Multiagent Neurobiological Systems: Conceptual Model and Data , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[34]  Carlos Lago,et al.  The influence of match location, quality of opposition, and match status on possession strategies in professional association football , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[35]  P. Krustrup,et al.  High-intensity running in English FA Premier League soccer matches , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[36]  Carlos Lago,et al.  Determinants of possession of the ball in soccer , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[37]  Mike Hughes,et al.  Analysis of passing sequences, shots and goals in soccer , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.