Influence of cyber-attacks on longitudinal safety of connected and automated vehicles.

Connected and automated vehicle (CAV) has been a remarkable focal point in recent years, since it is recognized as a potential method to reduce traffic congestion, emission and accident. However, the connectivity function makes CAVs vulnerable to cyber-attacks. An intuitive method to defend cyber-attacks on CAVs is that if the error between expected and measured behaviors exceeds a predetermined threshold, a security scheme should be activated. This study investigates another type of cyber-attack, denoted as slight attacks, in which the communicated data of CAVs are randomly deviated from the actual ones and deviations do not exceed the threshold. The primary objective is to evaluate the influence of slight cyber-attacks on longitudinal safety of CAVs. An empirical CAV model is first utilized to describe vehicle dynamics and generate trajectory data. A rear-end collision risk index (RCRI) derived from safe stopping distance is used to establish relation between longitudinal safety and trajectory data. Two attacked factors, communicated positions and speeds from preceding vehicles are tested. Extensive simulations are conducted and parameters are also tested via sensitivity analysis. Results indicate that (1) when one CAV is under slight cyber-attacks, it is more dangerous if communicated positions are attacked than speeds; (2) when multi CAVs are under attacked, it is possible that a situation with more vehicles under attack at a low severity may be more dangerous than that with fewer vehicles but under attack at a high severity; (3) the impact of slight cyber-attacks on deceleration period is more serious compared to acceleration period. The findings of this study provide useful suggestion for defending cyber-attacks on CAVs and improving longitudinal safety in the future.

[1]  Wei Wang,et al.  Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[2]  Xiao-Yun Lu,et al.  COOPERATIVE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (CACC) DEFINITIONS AND OPERATING CONCEPTS , 2015 .

[3]  Amir Reza Mamdoohi,et al.  The effects of indicating rear-end collision risk via variable message signs on traffic behaviour , 2017 .

[4]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Developing an algorithm to assess the rear-end collision risk under fog conditions using real-time data , 2018 .

[5]  Dipak Ghosal,et al.  Security vulnerabilities of connected vehicle streams and their impact on cooperative driving , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Lu Xing,et al.  Integrated Cooperative Adaptive Cruise and Variable Speed Limit Controls for Reducing Rear-End Collision Risks Near Freeway Bottlenecks Based on Micro-Simulations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Wei Wang,et al.  Evaluating impacts of different longitudinal driver assistance systems on reducing multi-vehicle rear-end crashes during small-scale inclement weather. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Christian G. Claudel,et al.  Spoofing cyber attack detection in probe-based traffic monitoring systems using mixed integer linear programming , 2013, ICNC.

[9]  Steven E. Shladover,et al.  Connected and automated vehicle systems: Introduction and overview , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[10]  Di Ma,et al.  A Functional Co-Design towards Safe and Secure Vehicle Platooning , 2017, CPSS@AsiaCCS.

[11]  Sami Muhaidat,et al.  Novel cross layer detection schemes to detect blackhole attack against QoS-OLSR protocol in VANET , 2016, Veh. Commun..

[12]  Jonathan Miller,et al.  Cyber Threats Facing Autonomous and Connected Vehicles: Future Challenges , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Wei Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on reducing rear-end collision risks on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Flávio Cunto,et al.  Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Soodeh Dadras,et al.  Vehicular Platooning in an Adversarial Environment , 2015, AsiaCCS.

[16]  Chengcheng Xu,et al.  Can we trust the speed–spacing relationship estimated by car-following model from non-stationary trajectory data? , 2019 .

[17]  Gongjun Yan,et al.  Security challenges in vehicular cloud computing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data , 2014 .

[19]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Estimation of rear-end vehicle crash frequencies in urban road tunnels. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Cheol Oh,et al.  Estimation of rear-end crash potential using vehicle trajectory data. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Ling Wang,et al.  Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Lo'ai Tawalbeh,et al.  Cyber Security Attacks on Smart Cities and Associated Mobile Technologies , 2017, ANT/SEIT.

[23]  Juneyoung Park,et al.  Effects of Connected-Vehicle Warning Systems on Rear-End Crash Avoidance Behavior Under Fog Conditions , 2018 .

[24]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Creating complex congestion patterns via multi-objective optimal freeway traffic control with application to cyber-security , 2016 .

[25]  Pierluigi Pisu,et al.  Real-Time Detection and Estimation of Denial of Service Attack in Connected Vehicle Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[26]  Ye Li,et al.  Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Hao Wang,et al.  Optimal velocity model with dual boundary optimal velocity function , 2015 .

[28]  Young-Jun Kweon,et al.  Development of Crash Prediction Models with Individual Vehicular Data , 2011 .

[29]  Shihong Huang,et al.  Vulnerability of Traffic Control System Under Cyberattacks with Falsified Data , 2018 .

[30]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.