Evaluation of efficiency optimized variable flux reluctance machine for EVs/HEVs by comparing with interior PM machine

As one of crucial components for electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), the electrical machine has been widely evaluated from the prospective of machine topology, torque density, permanent magnet usage, and efficiency. In this paper, novel variable flux reluctance machines (VFRMs), which do not have either brush/slip-ring or rare-earth permanent magnet, is evaluated for EV/HEV application with emphasis on driving efficiency. Two VFRMs are designed to compare with the interior permanent magnet machine (IPMM) used in Toyota /Prius 2010. Both machines have the same outer diameter as that of IPMM. However, one is with the same core length as the IPMM; the other one is with the same machine axial length as IPMM accounting for the end-windings. Based on the quantity evaluations of average torque, torque/power-speed characteristic, efficiency map and energy consumption during the city and highway drive cycles, the VFRM shows it can be a prospective low cost candidate for the EV/HEV application by providing the comparative torque density, efficiency and small torque ripple similar to the IPMM.

[1]  Y. Kano,et al.  Design of slipring-less winding excited synchronous motor for hybrid electric vehicle , 2012, 2012 15th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS).

[2]  Mircea Popescu,et al.  A comparison of an interior permanent magnet and copper rotor induction motor in a hybrid electric vehicle application , 2013, 2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[3]  S. Ogasawara,et al.  Test Results and Torque Improvement of the 50-kW Switched Reluctance Motor Designed for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[4]  A. Emadi,et al.  Comprehensive drive train efficiency analysis of hybrid electric and fuel cell vehicles based on motor-controller efficiency modeling , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[5]  Zi-Qiang Zhu,et al.  Electrical Machines and Drives for Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Ming Cheng,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Flux-Switching Permanent-Magnet Motors With Interior Permanent Magnet Motor for EV, HEV, and PHEV Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  Z. Q. Zhu,et al.  Individual and global optimization of switched flux permanent magnet motors , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems.

[8]  Philip T. Krein,et al.  Evaluation of Induction and Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machines Using Drive-Cycle Energy and Loss Minimization in Traction Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[9]  N. Matsui,et al.  Design study and experimental analysis of wound field flux switching motor for HEV applications , 2012, 2012 XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines.

[10]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Electromagnetic Performance of Novel Variable Flux Reluctance Machines With DC-Field Coil in Stator , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[11]  Chester Coomer,et al.  Evaluation of the 2010 Toyota Prius Hybrid Synergy Drive System , 2011 .

[12]  António J. Marques Cardoso,et al.  Efficiency Analysis of Drive Train Topologies Applied to Electric/Hybrid Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Lionel Vido,et al.  Hybrid Excitation Synchronous Machines: Energy-Efficient Solution for Vehicles Propulsion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[14]  G. Pellegrino,et al.  Comparison of Induction and PM Synchronous Motor Drives for EV Application Including Design Examples , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[15]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Low cost flux-switching brushless AC machines , 2010, 2010 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.