Challenges with Novel Clinical Trial Designs: Master Protocols

The 2018 Accelerating Anticancer Agent Development (AAADV) Workshop assembled a panel of experts for an in-depth discussion session to present “Challenges with Novel Clinical Trial Designs.” This panel offered assessments of the challenges faced by industry, the FDA, investigators, institutional review boards, and patients. The panel focused on master protocols, which include umbrella trials, platform trials, and basket trials. Umbrella trials and platform trials share many commonalities, whereas basket trials are more distinct. Umbrella and platform trials are generally designed with multiple arms where patients of the same histology or other unifying characteristics are enrolled into different arms and multiple investigational agents are evaluated in a single protocol. In contrast, basket studies generally enroll patients with different tumor types based on the presence of a specific mutation or biomarker regardless of histology; these trials may include expansion cohorts. These novel designs offer the promise of expedited drug assessment and approval, but they also place new challenges on all the stakeholders involved in the drug development process. Only by identifying the challenges of these complex, innovative clinical trial designs and highlighting challenges from each perspective can we begin to address these challenges. The 2018 AAADV Workshop convened a panel of experts from relevant disciplines to highlight the challenges that are created by master protocols, and, where appropriate, offer strategies to address these challenges.

[1]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[2]  Patrick D. Larkey,et al.  Bridging Different Eras in Sports , 1999 .

[3]  P. Keegan,et al.  FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Whose Tumors Express Programmed Death-Ligand 1 , 2016, The oncologist.

[4]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[5]  Good clinical practice research guidelines reviewed, emphasis given to responsibilities of investigators: second article in a series. , 2008, Journal of oncology practice.

[6]  D. Sargent,et al.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other master protocols: a review and examples. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  A New Framework for Patient Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials Cooperative Group Studies , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  Robert A Beckman,et al.  How many tumor indications should be initially screened in development of next generation immunotherapies? , 2017, Contemporary clinical trials.

[9]  J. Samet,et al.  Food and Drug Administration , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  D. D. de Alwis,et al.  Pembrolizumab KEYNOTE-001: an adaptive study leading to accelerated approval for two indications and a companion diagnostic , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Drug development in the era of precision medicine , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[13]  David Wholley,et al.  Lung Master Protocol (Lung-MAP)—A Biomarker-Driven Protocol for Accelerating Development of Therapies for Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: SWOG S1400 , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  Janet Woodcock,et al.  Accelerating identification and regulatory approval of investigational cancer drugs. , 2011, JAMA.

[15]  I. Fodor,et al.  Catalyzing the field of precision oncology, one basket at a time , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[16]  Donald A. Berry,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer (BC): Results from I-SPY 2. , 2017 .

[17]  F. Hirsch,et al.  Innovative Clinical Trials: The LUNG‐MAP Study , 2015, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[18]  K. He,et al.  FDA Approval Summary: Accelerated Approval of Pembrolizumab for Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  J. Perlmutter,et al.  Cancer research advocacy: past, present, and future. , 2013, Cancer research.

[20]  L. Malik,et al.  Informed Consent for Phase I Oncology Trials: Form, Substance and Signature , 2014, Journal of clinical medicine research.

[21]  J. Woodcock,et al.  Master Protocols to Study Multiple Therapies, Multiple Diseases, or Both. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  C. Rudin,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody MK-3475 in 411 patients (pts) with melanoma (MEL). , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  J. Blay,et al.  Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A. Redig,et al.  Basket trials and the evolution of clinical trial design in an era of genomic medicine. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  D. DeMets,et al.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[28]  Mary W Redman,et al.  The Master Protocol Concept. , 2015, Seminars in oncology.

[29]  D. Berry,et al.  Reports from the 2010 Clinical and Translational Cancer Research Think Tank Meeting: Design Strategies for Personalized Therapy Trials , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[30]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Richard Simon,et al.  Improving Clinical Trial Efficiency: Thinking outside the Box. , 2015, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[32]  H. West Novel Precision Medicine Trial Designs: Umbrellas and Baskets. , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[33]  Ludmila V. Danilova,et al.  Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade , 2017, Science.

[34]  Evaluation of question-listing at the Cancer Support Community , 2013, Translational behavioral medicine.

[35]  Lorenzo Trippa,et al.  Bayesian response‐adaptive designs for basket trials , 2017, Biometrics.

[36]  Donald A Berry,et al.  The Brave New World of clinical cancer research: Adaptive biomarker‐driven trials integrating clinical practice with clinical research , 2015, Molecular oncology.

[37]  Funda Meric-Bernstam,et al.  Efficacy of Larotrectinib in TRK Fusion–Positive Cancers in Adults and Children , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  L. Diaz,et al.  386PEfficacy of pembrolizumab in phase 2 KEYNOTE-164 and KEYNOTE-158 studies of microsatellite instability high cancers , 2017 .

[39]  Lawrence D. True,et al.  Guidelines for the Development and Incorporation of Biomarker Studies in Early Clinical Trials of Novel Agents , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[40]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch repair deficiency. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.