ISFG: Recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing.

The Paternity Testing Commission (PTC) of the International Society for Forensic Genetics has taken up the task of establishing the biostatistical recommendations in accordance with the ISO 17025 standards and a previous set of ISFG recommendations specific to the genetic investigations in paternity cases. In the initial set, the PTC recommended that biostatistical evaluations of paternity are based on a likelihood ratio principle - yielding the paternity index, PI. Here, we have made five supplementary biostatistical recommendations. The first recommendation clarifies and defines basic concepts of genetic hypotheses and calculation concerns needed to produce valid PIs. The second and third recommendations address issues associated with population genetics (allele probabilities, Y-chromosome markers, mtDNA, and population substructuring) and special circumstances (deficiency/reconstruction and immigration cases), respectively. The fourth recommendation considers strategies regarding genetic evidence against paternity. The fifth recommendation covers necessary documentation, reporting details and assumptions underlying calculations. The PTC strongly suggests that these recommendations should be adopted by all laboratories involved in paternity testing as the basis for their biostatistical analysis.

[1]  Leonard Steinborn,et al.  International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories , 2004 .

[2]  Richard A. Nichols,et al.  A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity , 2008, Genetica.

[3]  P. Ihm.  The Problem of Paternity in the Light of Decision Theory , 1981 .

[4]  C. A. Smith,et al.  THE ESTIMATION OF GENE FREQUENCIES IN A RANDOM‐MATING POPULATION , 1955, Annals of human genetics.

[5]  B Brinkmann,et al.  DNA commission of the international society for forensic genetics: guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[6]  M. R. Mickey,et al.  Empirical validation of the Essen-Möller probability of paternity. , 1986, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[8]  B Brinkmann,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y-chromosome STRs. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[9]  Aravinda Chakravarti,et al.  No fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index. , 1986 .

[10]  A. Carracedo,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): an update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[11]  K Roeder,et al.  No excess of homozygosity at loci used for DNA fingerprinting. , 1990, Science.

[12]  A. Hirschman.  THE PATERNITY OF AN INDEX , 1964 .

[13]  N E Morton,et al.  Genetic structure of forensic populations. , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  D. Gjertson,et al.  Assessing probability of paternity and the product rule in DNA systems , 2005, Genetica.

[15]  A Chakravarti,et al.  Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index. , 1985, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  C. Rittner,et al.  Das Bayessche Theorem und die Überprüfung seiner Anwendung zur Berechnung der Vaterschaftsplausibilität , 2005, Zeitschrift für Rechtsmedizin.

[17]  Max P. Baur,et al.  How to Deal with Mutations in DNA-Testing , 1992 .

[18]  A. Dawid,et al.  Non-fatherhood or mutation? A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[19]  C. Brenner.  Symbolic kinship program. , 1997, Genetics.

[20]  C. Brenner,et al.  The Avuncular Index and the Incest Index , 1988 .

[21]  R. Elston.  Probability and paternity testing. , 1986, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  B Brinkmann,et al.  Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[23]  Niels Morling,et al.  Paternity Testing Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on genetic investigations in paternity cases. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[24]  Erik Essen-möller,et al.  Zur Theorie des Vaterschaftsnachweises auf Grund von Ähnlichkeitsbefunden , 1939, Deutsche Zeitschrift für die gesamte gerichtliche Medizin.

[25]  W. Schull.  Inclusion probabilities in parentage testing , 1984 .

[26]  M. Baur,et al.  No fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index. , 1986, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  P I Terasaki,et al.  Calculation of probability of paternity using DNA sequences. , 1988, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): an update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[29]  Charles H Brenner,et al.  Some mathematical problems in the DNA identification of victims in the 2004 tsunami and similar mass fatalities. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[30]  H. Gurtler.  Principles of blood-group statistical evaluation of paternity cases at the University Institute of Forensic Medicine, Copenhagen. , 1956, Acta medicinae legalis et socialis.

[31]  Maximum-likelihood estimation of the proportion of nonpaternity. , 1965, American journal of human genetics.

[32]  Hans-Jürgen Bandelt,et al.  A practical guide to mitochondrial DNA error prevention in clinical, forensic, and population genetics. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[33]  [A method to calculate the plausibility of paternity using blood group results of any relatives (author's transl)]. , 1975, Zeitschrift fur Immunitatsforschung, experimentelle und klinische Immunologie.

[34]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[35]  R. Nichols,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1999, Heredity.

[36]  H. N. Magoun.  Thomas, Springfield, Illinois , 1965 .

[37]  Donald A. Berry,et al.  Inferences Using DNA Profiling in Forensic Identification and Paternity Cases , 1991 .

[38]  Gillian Tully,et al.  The EDNAP mitochondrial DNA population database (EMPOP) collaborative exercises: organisation, results and perspectives. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[39]  N. Morling,et al.  International Society for Forensic Genetics , 2002 .

[40]  M. Krawczak,et al.  Use of X-linked markers for forensic purposes , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[41]  K K Kidd,et al.  The utility of DNA typing in forensic work. , 1991, Science.

[42]  U. Grigull,et al.  Die mathematischen Grundlagen , 1955 .

[43]  Peter M Schneider,et al.  Scientific standards for studies in forensic genetics. , 2007, Forensic science international.