Algorithmic Guided Screening of Drug Combinations of Arbitrary Size for Activity against Cancer Cells

The standard treatment for most advanced cancers is multidrug therapy. Unfortunately, combinations in the clinic often do not perform as predicted. Therefore, to complement identifying rational drug combinations based on biological assumptions, we hypothesized that a functional screen of drug combinations, without limits on combination sizes, will aid the identification of effective drug cocktails. Given the myriad possible cocktails and inspired by examples of search algorithms in diverse fields outside of medicine, we developed a novel, efficient search strategy called Medicinal Algorithmic Combinatorial Screen (MACS). Such algorithms work by enriching for the fitness of cocktails, as defined by specific attributes through successive generations. Because assessment of synergy was not feasible, we developed a novel alternative fitness function based on the level of inhibition and the number of drugs. Using a WST-1 assay on the A549 cell line, through MACS, we screened 72 combinations of arbitrary size formed from a 19-drug pool across four generations. Fenretinide, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, and bortezomib (FSB) was the fittest. FSB performed up to 4.18 SD above the mean of a random set of cocktails or “too well” to have been found by chance, supporting the utility of the MACS strategy. Validation studies showed FSB was inhibitory in all 7 other NSCLC cell lines tested. It was also synergistic in A549, the one cell line in which this was evaluated. These results suggest that when guided by MACS, screening larger drug combinations may be feasible as a first step in combination drug discovery in a relatively small number of experiments. [Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(3):521–32]

[1]  V. Devita,et al.  Cancer : Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .

[2]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Targeted Agents: The Rules of Combination , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  Angelika M. Burger,et al.  Phase I trial of vorinostat plus bortezomib (bort) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (mm) patients (pts) , 2008 .

[5]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[6]  R. Motzer,et al.  Computerized quantitation of synergism and antagonism of taxol, topotecan, and cisplatin against human teratocarcinoma cell growth: a rational approach to clinical protocol design. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  Goldie Jh,et al.  A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. , 1979 .

[8]  Andrew B. Nixon,et al.  Results of a phase I study of bevacizumab (BV), everolimus (EV), and erlotinib (E) in patients with advanced solid tumors , 2007 .

[9]  Colin Macilwain The right combination , 2005, Nature.

[10]  Hong-Bin Fang,et al.  Experimental design and interaction analysis of combination studies of drugs with log‐linear dose responses , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  J H Goldie,et al.  A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. , 1979, Cancer treatment reports.

[12]  T. Chou,et al.  Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. , 1984, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[13]  Adam Smith,et al.  Screening for drug discovery: The leading question , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Robert Gray,et al.  Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Wilding,et al.  A phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in refractory solid tumors. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  W Malone,et al.  Tolerability of the synthetic retinoid Fenretinide (HPR). , 1989, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[17]  Young Mi Whang,et al.  Hyperacetylation enhances the growth-inhibitory effect of all-trans retinoic acid by the restoration of retinoic acid receptor β expression in head and neck squamous carcinoma (HNSCC) cells , 2005, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[18]  Marc S. Lavine,et al.  The Right Combination , 2006, Science.

[19]  Satish K. Tickoo,et al.  Retinoic Acid and the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Trichostatin A Inhibit the Proliferation of Human Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Xenograft Tumor Model , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  R. Sun,et al.  Closed-loop control of cellular functions using combinatory drugs guided by a stochastic search algorithm , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[22]  Robert A Goodnow,et al.  Hit and Lead identification: efficient practices for drug discovery. , 2007, Progress in medicinal chemistry.

[23]  David R. Jones,et al.  Proteasome inhibition sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer to histone deacetylase inhibitor-induced apoptosis through the generation of reactive oxygen species. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  Hussein A. Abbass,et al.  An evolutionary artificial neural networks approach for breast cancer diagnosis , 2002, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[25]  Y H Chang,et al.  Feature selection for computerized mass detection in digitized mammograms by using a genetic algorithm. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[26]  G. Steele,et al.  Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1983 .