Living kidney donors ages 70 and older: recipient and donor outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The profound organ shortage has resulted in longer waiting times and increased mortality for those awaiting kidney transplantation. Consequently, patients are turning to older living donors. It is unclear if an upper age limit for donation should exist, both in terms of recipient and donor outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In the United States, 219 healthy adults aged ≥70 have donated kidneys at 80 of 279 transplant centers. Competing risks models with matched controls were used to study the independent association between older donor age and allograft survival, accounting for the competing risk of recipient mortality as well as other transplant factors. RESULTS Among recipients of older live donor allografts, graft loss was significantly higher than matched 50-to 59-year-old live donor allografts (subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16 to 2.28, P = 0.005) but similar to matched nonextended criteria 50-to 59-year-old deceased donor allografts (SHR 1.19, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.63, P = 0.3). Mortality among living kidney donors aged ≥70 was no higher than healthy matched controls drawn from the NHANES-III cohort; in fact, mortality was lower, probably reflecting higher selectivity among older live donors than could be captured in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (NHANES-III; HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.65, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These findings support living donation among older adults but highlight the advantages of finding a younger donor, particularly for younger recipients.

[1]  J. Gastwirth The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini Index , 1972 .

[2]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Clinical results from transplanting incompatible live kidney donor/recipient pairs using kidney paired donation. , 2005, JAMA.

[3]  Lloyd E Ratner,et al.  The Altruistic Unbalanced Paired Kidney Exchange: Proof of Concept and Survey of Potential Donor and Recipient Attitudes , 2010, Transplantation.

[4]  V. Coviello,et al.  Cumulative Incidence Estimation in the Presence of Competing Risks , 2004 .

[5]  A. Garg,et al.  Accepting Kidneys from Older Living Donors: Impact on Transplant Recipient Outcomes , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[6]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk , 1999 .

[7]  W. Weimar,et al.  Long-term consequences of kidney donation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  D. Segev,et al.  Expanding Kidney Paired Donation Through Participation by Compatible Pairs , 2007, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[9]  M. Schnitzler,et al.  Racial variation in medical outcomes among living kidney donors. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  D. Segev,et al.  Domino paired kidney donation: a strategy to make best use of live non-directed donation , 2006, The Lancet.

[11]  M S Pepe,et al.  Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data? , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  D. Asch,et al.  Substantial Variation in the Acceptance of Medically Complex Live Kidney Donors Across US Renal Transplant Centers , 2008, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[13]  A. Bingaman,et al.  Kidney paired donation in live-donor kidney transplantation. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  W. Weimar,et al.  Living Kidney Donors: Impact of Age on Long‐Term Safety , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[15]  D. Segev,et al.  Improving Distribution Efficiency of Hard‐to‐Place Deceased Donor Kidneys: Predicting Probability of Discard or Delay , 2010, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[16]  Eld,et al.  COMPARISON OF MORTALITY IN ALL PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS , PATIENTS ON DIALYSIS AWAITING TRANSPLANTATION , AND RECIPIENTS OF A FIRST CADAVERIC TRANSPLANT , 2000 .

[17]  L. Freedman Tables of the number of patients required in clinical trials using the logrank test. , 1982, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  A nonsimultaneous, extended, altruistic-donor chain. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  V. Ashby,et al.  Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation in the United States, 1997–2006: The HRSA Breakthrough Collaboratives and the 58 DSA Challenge , 2008, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[20]  J. H. Kim,et al.  Effect of donor age on outcome of living related kidney transplantation. , 1996, Transplantation proceedings.

[21]  Scott R. Johnson,et al.  Older living donors provide excellent quality kidneys: a single center experience (older living donors) , 2005, Clinical transplantation.

[22]  B. Caffo,et al.  Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. , 2010, JAMA.

[23]  J. Schold,et al.  Half of kidney transplant candidates who are older than 60 years now placed on the waiting list will die before receiving a deceased-donor transplant. , 2009, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[24]  S. McDonald,et al.  Effect of donor-recipient age difference on graft function and survival in live-donor kidney transplantation. , 2011, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.