Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction.

Would people exhibit similarity-attraction and consistency-attraction toward unambiguously computer-generated speech even when personality is clearly not relevant? In Experiment 1, participants (extrovert or introvert) heard a synthesized voice (extrovert or introvert) on a book-buying Web site. Participants accurately recognized personality cues in text to speech and showed similarity-attraction in their evaluation of the computer voice, the book reviews, and the reviewer. Experiment 2, in a Web auction context, added personality of the text to the previous design. The results replicated Experiment 1 and demonstrated consistency (voice and text personality)-attraction. To maximize liking and trust, designers should set parameters, for example, words per minute or frequency range, that create a personality that is consistent with the user and the content being presented.

[1]  Julian Baggini,et al.  SOCIAL animal. , 1953, Lancet.

[2]  E. Aronson,et al.  OPINION CHANGE AS A FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATOR'S ATTRACTIVENESS AND DESIRE TO INFLUENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  R W Ramsay.  Personality and speech. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  D. Byrne,et al.  Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  M. Lerner,et al.  Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  J. M. Jellison,et al.  Attraction as a function of the commonality and desirability of a trait shared with another. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  D. Byrne,et al.  Similarity and awareness of similarity of personality characteristics as determinants of attraction. , 1969 .

[8]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  The voice of confidence: Paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation. , 1973 .

[9]  S. Duck,et al.  Personality similarity and friendship choice: similarity of what, when? , 1973, Journal of personality.

[10]  Bruce L. Smith,et al.  Effects of Speech Rate on Personality Perception , 1975, Language and speech.

[11]  S. Chaiken,et al.  An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. , 1975 .

[12]  H. Giles,et al.  Speech style and social evaluation , 1975 .

[13]  C. Aronovitch.  The voice of personality: stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker. , 1976, The Journal of social psychology.

[14]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF TRUST AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SELF‐DISCLOSURE , 1977 .

[15]  K. Scherer.  Personality inference from voice quality: The loud voice of extroversion. , 1978 .

[16]  S. Field.  Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting , 1979 .

[17]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[18]  L. Streeter,et al.  Effects of Pitch and Speech Rate on Personal Attributions , 1979 .

[19]  Carl-Gustaf Söderberg,et al.  The physics of speech , 1980 .

[20]  F. Thomas,et al.  The illusion of life : Disney animation , 1981 .

[21]  G Denes,et al.  Discrimination and identification of emotions in human voice by brain‐damaged subjects , 1984, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[22]  Donald R. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Interaction and Similarity of Personality Attributes , 1984 .

[23]  S. Kahan.  Introduction to Acting , 1985 .

[24]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The Effects of Vocalics and Nonverbal Sensitivity on Compliance A Replication and Extension , 1986 .

[25]  J. B. Murray.  Review of Research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1990 .

[26]  J. Bryant,et al.  Responding to the screen : reception and reaction processes , 1991 .

[27]  M. Garman.  Psycholinguistics , 1992 .

[28]  E. Aronson.  The social animal, 7th ed. , 1994 .

[29]  J. Pittam.  Voice in Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 1994 .

[30]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Lynn M. Farnsworth,et al.  The perceptual representation of voice gender. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  David G. Stork,et al.  Hal's Legacy: 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality , 1996 .

[33]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[34]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  The role of speech processing in human-computer intelligent communication , 1997, Speech Commun..

[35]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Human values and the design of computer technology , 1997 .

[36]  Rosalind W. Picard.  Affective Computing , 1997 .

[37]  Chris Schmandt,et al.  Design of spatialized audio in nomadic environments , 1997 .

[38]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Are Computers Gender-Neutral? Gender Stereotypic Responses to Computers , 1997 .

[39]  Youngme Moon,et al.  Impression management in computer-based interviews: The effects of input modality, output modality, and distance. , 1998 .

[40]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Are computers scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-computer interaction , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Representing structured information in audio interfaces: a framework for selecting audio marking techniques to represent document structures , 1998 .

[42]  Satu Ruuska,et al.  Design: Designing mobile phones and communicators for consumer needs at Nokia , 1999, INTR.

[43]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Effects of Humor in Task-Oriented Human-Computer Interaction and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Direct Test of SRCT Theory , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[44]  Marc C. Beutnagel,et al.  The AT & T NEXT-GEN TTS system , 1999 .

[45]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[46]  J. Dillard,et al.  The sounds of dominance: Vocal precursors of perceived dominance during interpersonal influence , 2000 .

[47]  C. Nass,et al.  Can computer-generated speech have gender?: an experimental test of gender stereotype , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[49]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[50]  David Wood,et al.  The effect of task conditions on the comprehensibility of synthetic speech , 2000, CHI.

[51]  Joseph P. Olive.  The talking computer: text to speech synthesis , 2001 .