Reply to silberberg and ziriax.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Silberberg and Ziriax (1985) report that a modification of Vaughan's (1981) procedure produces results inconsistent with melioration (the position advocated by Vaughan) but consistent with a process they term molecular maximizing. Here it is argued that the theory of molecular maximization is not sufficiently unambiguous that researchers other than the developers can test its predictions, and that in any case none of the data presented by Silberberg and Ziriax are both clearly consistent with molecular maximization and inconsistent with melioration.
[1] W Vaughan,et al. Melioration, matching, and maximization. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[2] R. Herrnstein,et al. CHAPTER 5 – Melioration and Behavioral Allocation1 , 1980 .
[3] C. Shimp. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[4] A. Silberberg,et al. Molecular maximizing characterizes choice on Vaughan's (1981) procedure. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.