Randomized Comparison of Final Kissing Balloon Dilatation Versus No Final Kissing Balloon Dilatation in Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Main Vessel Stenting: The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Niemelä | J. Airaksinen | S. Vikman | T. Mäkikallio | H. Miettinen | J. Jensen | A. Erglis | S. James | T. Steigen | M. Maeng | J. Ravkilde | J. Lassen | M. Pietilä | L. Thuesen | N. Holm | S. Helqvist | Sanda Jēgere | M. Eskola | K. Kervinen | O. Frøbert | Evald H. Christiansen | J. Aarøe | L. Jensen | P. Thayssen | I. Kumsārs | A. Dombrovskis | T. Kellerth | K. N. Hansen | H. Romppanen | I. Sjögren | P. Gunnes | T. Trovik | S. Stavnes | A. Hervold | Lars Aberge | S. Jēgere | S. Jegere
[1] A. Baumbach,et al. Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions: The British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, New, and Evolving Strategies , 2010, Circulation.
[2] G. Wassmer,et al. Interventional Therapy of Bifurcation Lesions: A TIMI Flow-Guided Concept to Treat Side Branches in Bifurcation Lesions—A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study (Thueringer Bifurcation Study, THUEBIS Study as Pilot Trial) , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[3] John P A Ioannidis,et al. Double Versus Single Stenting for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[4] Javier Suárez de Lezo,et al. Intervencionismo coronario percutáneo en lesiones en bifurcación. ¿Puede su clasificación ayudar a seleccionar la estrategia terapéutica? , 2009 .
[5] A. Medina,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in bifurcation lesions. Does classification aid treatment selection? , 2009, Revista espanola de cardiologia.
[6] Antonio Colombo,et al. Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study , 2009, Circulation.
[7] F. Neumann,et al. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions , 2008, European heart journal.
[8] Antonio Colombo,et al. Bifurcation disease: what do we know, what should we do? , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[9] Young-Seok Cho,et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2008, European heart journal.
[10] P. Serruys,et al. Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.
[11] H. Bøtker,et al. Comparison of sirolimus-eluting and bare metal stents in coronary bifurcation lesions: subgroup analysis of the Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-Stress/Benestent Disease Trial (SCANDSTENT). , 2006, American heart journal.
[12] J. Tanigawa,et al. Complex coronary interventions: unprotected left main and bifurcation lesions. , 2006, Journal of interventional cardiology.
[13] M. Niemelä,et al. Randomized Study on Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The Nordic Bifurcation Study , 2006, Circulation.
[14] Douglas Scott,et al. Drug‐eluting stents for coronary bifurcations: Bench testing of provisional side‐branch strategies , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[15] I. Iakovou,et al. Cardiac Pacemaker ( If ) Current : Physiological and Pharmacological Properties , 2006 .
[16] I. Iakovou,et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[17] M. Morice,et al. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: a rational approach. , 2001, Journal of interventional cardiology.