Data processing in the cat motoneuron system: averaging functions and rate limitation

The variability in instantaneous frequency of cat motoneurons in response to various degrees of regularity and synchronization of input is used to examine several forms of data processing occurring in the cat motoneuron system. A theoretical basis is presented which distinguishes between spatial averaging and time averaging of information from muscle afferents and which suggests realizable experiments for assessing their relative strengths. The results of the experiments demonstrate spatial averaging to be a strong form of processing in the motoneuron system; time averaging is found to be much less so. Thus, temporal information is preserved to a greater extent by the motoneuron than is spatial information. Also, an inherent source of motoneuron variability is identified and linked with the process of rate limitation.

[1]  C. Stevens,et al.  Synaptic noise and other sources of randomness in motoneuron interspike intervals. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  C. Hunt MONOSYNAPTIC REFLEX RESPONSE OF SPINAL MOTONEURONS TO GRADED AFFERENT STIMULATION , 1955, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  V. Brooks,et al.  Recurrent inhibition in the cat's spinal cord , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  P. Matthews,et al.  The central control of the dynamic response of muscle spindle receptors , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  P. Matthews,et al.  The regularity of primary and secondary muscle spindle afferent discharges , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  J. Eccles,et al.  Distribution of recurrent inhibition among motoneurones , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Eccles,et al.  Electrophysiological investigations on Renshaw cells , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  R. Granit,et al.  The behaviour of tonic α and β motoneurones during stimulation of recurrent collaterals , 1957 .

[9]  D G Lampard,et al.  Monosynaptic stochastic stimulation of cat spinal motoneurons. I. Response of motoneurons to sustained stimulation. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Grollman ULTRAFILTRATION THROUGH COLLODION MEMBRANES , 1926, The Journal of general physiology.

[11]  W. H. Talbot,et al.  Distribution of recurrent facilitation and inhibition in cat spinal cord. , 1960, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  R. Poppele,et al.  Quantitative description of linear behavior of mammalian muscle spindles. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  R. Granit,et al.  Recurrent inhibition in relation to frequency of firing and limitation of discharge rate of extensor motoneurones , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  G. Somjen,et al.  Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  P. Matthews,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length , 1969, The Journal of physiology.