Ex Vivo Safety and Efficacy of Using Paired Peripheral Incisions in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts to Facilitate Unscrolling.

PURPOSE To evaluate the ex vivo safety and efficacy of using paired peripheral incisions to achieve a triple scroll conformation that facilitates unscrolling in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS The safety of adding paired peripheral incisions to DMEK grafts was evaluated by assessing endothelial cell loss (ECL) and risk of tearing. ECL was measured using calcein-AM staining after incisions. The risk of tearing was evaluated by comparing incision lengths before and after simulated DMEK surgery using cadaveric eyes. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing the scrolling pattern and the width of grafts with different incision lengths (0.0 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm). Surgical unscrolling times in simulated DMEK surgery by a novice DMEK surgeon were evaluated to determine whether incisions facilitate unscrolling in DMEK surgery. RESULTS The mean ECL after adding incisions was 0.78% ± 0.23%. There was no significant change in incision length after simulated DMEK surgery (P = 0.6). In donor grafts aged less than or equal to 65 years, 60% (6/10) achieved a stable triple scroll with 0.5 mm incisions and 80% (8/10) achieved a stable triple scroll with 1.0 mm incisions. In donor grafts aged greater than 65 years, 0% (0/4) achieved a stable triple scroll. Mean graft width increased significantly after forming a triple scroll (5575 μm ± 1128 μm) compared with baseline (1563 μm ± 428 μm) (P < 0.001). In the hands of a novice DMEK surgeon, the mean unscrolling time was significantly shorter with incisions (2.61 min ± 1.41 min) versus without incisions (5.44 min ± 3.17 min) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Paired peripheral incisions are safe and effective for inducing a triple scroll in DMEK grafts with donor age less than or equal to 65 years. Adding incisions may facilitate unscrolling for inexperienced DMEK surgeons.

[1]  P. Perri,et al.  Cannula-Assisted Technique to Unfold Grafts in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2019, Cornea.

[2]  S. Jabbour,et al.  The role of novel DMEK graft shapes in facilitating intraoperative unscrolling , 2018, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[3]  D. Gatinel,et al.  Impact of Surgical Learning Curve in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty on Visual Acuity Gain , 2017, Cornea.

[4]  J. Rose-Nussbaumer,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty During the Surgeon Learning Curve Versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty Performed at the Same Time , 2016, Journal of clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[5]  M. Moschos,et al.  Visual Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty—Comparison of Specific Matched Pairs , 2016, Cornea.

[6]  D. Ponzin,et al.  Contact Lens-Assisted Pull-Through Technique for Delivery of Tri-Folded (Endothelium in) DMEK Grafts Minimizes Surgical Time and Cell Loss. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Jeffrey D. Holiman,et al.  The S-stamp in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Safely Eliminates Upside-down Graft Implantation. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[8]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Bubble technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation in an eye bank: air or liquid? , 2015, Acta ophthalmologica.

[9]  A. Joussen,et al.  Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[10]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Influence of Donor Characteristics on Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2014, Cornea.

[11]  F. Price,et al.  Evolution of Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2013, Cornea.

[12]  Claus Cursiefen,et al.  Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty--rapid recovery of visual acuity. , 2013, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[13]  K. Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Novel Maneuver Facilitating Descemet Membrane Unfolding in the Anterior Chamber , 2013, Cornea.

[14]  I. Dapena,et al.  Intraocular graft unfolding techniques in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[15]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[16]  Frederico P. Guerra,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty: Fellow Eyes Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[17]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Efficacy of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcome of 200 consecutive cases after a learning curve of 25 cases. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[20]  I. Dapena,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK - the thinner the better? , 2009, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[21]  M. Terry Endothelial keratoplasty: history, current state, and future directions. , 2006, Cornea.

[22]  E. J. Farge Eye Bank Association of America (EBAA) Activities for 1980???81 , 1982 .