Proposal of a Validation Method of Failure Mode Analyses based on the Stress-Strength Model with a Support Vector Machine

Abstract This study aims at developing a validation method for the rational association between the design deviations, possible damage/fracture modes, and the eventual failure modes using SVM. Product failures due to damage/fracture modes of materials have recently increased, which suggests the importance of proactive prevention by failure modes analyses. Conventional Failure Modes and Effects Analyses (FMEA) lacks a specific process in determination of possible damage/fracture of component’ s materials. A modified Design Review Based on Failure Modes (DRBFM) or Design Deviation Method (DDM) were proposed to determine failure modes induced by damage/fracture modes of materials by possible associations from deviations in design/environmental factors to the deteriorations in stress-strength model. These methods still remain the possible errors in selection of rational damage/fracture modes to complicated patterns of design deviations, which suggests the importance of validation on the result of failure modes analyses. The procedure of DDM was formulated using sparse matrix and then analyzed using multi-class determination by Support Vector Machine(SVM). A case study of failure modes analyses to a laser-irradiation device using FMEA, DRBFM, the proposed DDM were conducted by individual three groups which had same number of 7 participants. The participants in the DDM group could predict more failure mechanisms by damage/fracture modes of materials than those by the DRBFM and FMEA groups. Furthermore, SVM showed higher precision rate from 77% to 100%, which evaluated the validity of specific failure modes. The SVM could determine the rational associations among the design deviations, the deviations in the SSM, and the corresponding damage/fracture modes.

[1]  Tamotsu Murakami,et al.  Method of Computer-Aided Fault Tree Analysis for High-Reliable and Safety Design , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[2]  Seyed Taghi Akhavan Niaki,et al.  Fault Tree Analysis for Reliability Evaluation of an Advanced Complex Manufacturing System , 2018 .

[3]  Tamotsu Murakami,et al.  物理量次元インデクシングに基づく故障木解析の知識マネジメント( 第18回設計工学・システム部門講演会) , 2009 .

[4]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Engineering Systems , 1997 .

[5]  Jin Wang,et al.  Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Paul Baybutt Design intent for hazard and operability studies , 2016 .

[7]  P. W. H. Chung,et al.  An automated system for batch hazard and operability studies , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Manuel Rodríguez,et al.  A new tool for risk analysis and assessment in petrochemical plants , 2016 .

[9]  G. Baudat,et al.  Generalized Discriminant Analysis Using a Kernel Approach , 2000, Neural Computation.

[10]  Federico Girosi,et al.  An Equivalence Between Sparse Approximation and Support Vector Machines , 1998, Neural Computation.

[11]  Gary J. Powers,et al.  Computer-aided Synthesis of Fault-trees , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[12]  J.R. Taylor,et al.  An Algorithm For Fault-Tree Construction , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[13]  Takashi Yukawa,et al.  Development of Web-based Design Review System for Reliability and Safety Knowledge Management , 2010 .

[14]  Zhiyong Gao,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using Dempster-Shafer theory and TOPSIS method: Application to the gas insulated metal enclosed transmission line (GIL) , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  Celso Marcelo Franklin Lapa,et al.  FUZZY METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR DIGITAL SYSTEM IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS , 2011 .

[16]  C. H. Lie,et al.  Fault Tree Analysis, Methods, and Applications ߝ A Review , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[17]  Feng Wang,et al.  A new intelligent assistant system for HAZOP analysis of complex process plant , 2012 .

[18]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  Hirokazu Shimizu,et al.  Design review based on failure mode to visualise reliability problems in the development stage of mechanical products , 2010 .

[20]  Yuichi Otsuka,et al.  EFFICACIOUS DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS INCLUDING ON-THE-JOB TRAINING IN FINDING MISUNDERSTAND ERRORS , 2009 .

[21]  Tamotsu Murakami,et al.  Knowledge management for fault tree analysis based on quantity dimension indexing , 2008, DAC 2008.

[22]  Massimiliano Pontil,et al.  Properties of Support Vector Machines , 1998, Neural Computation.

[23]  Paul W. H. Chung,et al.  A systematic Hazop procedure for batch processes, and its application to pipeless plants , 2000 .

[24]  N Cao,et al.  Validating FMEA output against incident learning data: A study in stereotactic body radiation therapy. , 2015, Medical physics.

[25]  Simon P. Wilson,et al.  Prior Robustness for Bayesian Implementation of the Fault Tree Analysis , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[26]  T. Ruxton,et al.  Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables , 1995 .

[27]  Gang Yin,et al.  Online fault diagnosis method based on Incremental Support Vector Data Description and Extreme Learning Machine with incremental output structure , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[28]  Yuichi Otsuka,et al.  EMPIRICAL CONSIDERATION OF PREDICTING CHAIN FAILURE MODES IN PRODUCT STRUCTURES DURING DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS , 2011 .

[29]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling , 2005 .

[30]  V. Vapnik,et al.  Bounds on Error Expectation for Support Vector Machines , 2000, Neural Computation.

[31]  Celso Marcelo Franklin Lapa,et al.  Hazard and operability study using approximate reasoning in light-water reactors passive systems , 2006 .

[32]  Tamotsu Murakami,et al.  Method of Computer-Aided FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) in Reliability Design and Development; Using Knowledge Management Based on Quantity Dimension Indexing and Block Diagram , 2012 .

[33]  F. Koark,et al.  Avoiding Safety Scandals by Controlling the Risk of Material Changes , 2017 .

[34]  Ole Winther,et al.  Gaussian Processes for Classification: Mean-Field Algorithms , 2000, Neural Computation.

[35]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Support Vector Machines in R , 2006 .

[36]  Tomoyuki Okabe,et al.  A Method for Determining Failure Modes Associated with Damage/Fracture of Materials in Early Design Stages , 2020, Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention.

[37]  Mohammad Reza Hairi Yazdi,et al.  An Extension to Fuzzy Developed Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FDFMEA) Application for Aircraft Landing System , 2017 .

[38]  Loon Ching Tang,et al.  Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..