Economic viability assessment of NASA's blended wing body N3-X aircraft

Numerous novel aircraft concepts are under development that aim to achieve dramatic increases in efficiency and reductions in emissions in comparison to current aircraft. Research into these concepts typically focuses on performance aspects to establish whether the aircraft will be capable of meeting developmental goals. However, the final goal of such concepts is to progress to viable commercial products. Economic viability assessments are therefore an integral part of the development process to ensure a sustainable industry. The key question to address is whether a high efficiency aircraft concept can translate into an attractive product from an economic perspective. This research performed an economic viability assessment of NASA’s N3-X aircraft, a blended wing body aircraft with a distributed boundary layer ingesting propulsion system. The sensitivity of the aircraft’s direct operating cost to changes in acquisition price and maintenance cost was predicted to establish maximum cost margins for the aircraft. In a May 2017 fuel price scenario, the N3-X could be no more than 25% more expensive than the baseline aircraft to remain economically viable. Introducing a carbon tax or fuel price jump widens the margin for increased costs. Aircraft cost estimates for the aircraft predict an acquisition cost from 11–37% more expensive than the baseline. In combination with the direct operating cost sensitivity analysis, the N3-X is predicted to need to capture 30% of the aircraft market up to 2035.

[1]  Vishal Sethi,et al.  Techno-economic viability assessments of greener propulsion technology under potential environmental regulatory policy scenarios , 2015 .

[2]  Paul Clark Buying the Big Jets: Fleet Planning for Airlines , 2001 .

[3]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion in a Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft , 2011 .

[4]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Engine Cycle Analysis for Hybrid-Wing-Body Aircraft , 2009 .

[5]  Jeffrey J. Berton,et al.  A Noise and Emissions Assessment of the N3-X Transport , 2014 .

[6]  Pericles Pilidis,et al.  Installed performance assessment of a boundary layer ingesting distributed propulsion system at design point , 2016 .

[7]  Boeing 787 from the Ground Up , 2022 .

[8]  Devaiah Nalianda,et al.  Techno-economic and Environmental Risk Assessment of a Blended Wing Body with Distributed Propulsion , 2015 .

[9]  Masoud Rais-Rohani,et al.  Toward manufacturing and cost considerations in multidisciplinary aircraft design , 1996 .

[10]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  An Examination of the Effect of Boundary Layer Ingestion on Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Systems , 2011 .

[11]  Stephen Lumby Investment appraisal and financing decisions : a first course in financial management , 1991 .

[12]  Susan A. Resetar,et al.  Advanced Airframe Structural Materials: A Primer and Cost Estimating Methodology , 1991 .

[13]  Michael Kennedy,et al.  Military Airframe Costs. The Effects of Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Processes , 2001 .

[14]  Mark V. Arena,et al.  Military Jet Engine Acquisition: Technology Basics and Cost-Estimating Methodology , 2002 .

[15]  John Birkler,et al.  Development and Production Cost Estimating Relationships for Aircraft Turbine Engines , 1982 .