Ensemble forecast post‐processing over Belgium: comparison of deterministic‐like and ensemble regression methods

A comparison of the benefits of post-processing ECMWF ensemble forecasts based on a deterministic-like and a regression technique is performed for Belgium. The former is a Linear Model Output Statistics technique (EVMOS) recently developed to allow provision of an appropriate ensemble variability at all lead times, and the latter is the Non-homogeneous Gaussian Regression, NGR. The training of the post-processing techniques is based on the reforecast dataset of ECMWF which covers a period from 1991 to 2007. The EVMOS approach is mainly providing a correction of the systematic error and does not enhance substantially the variance of the ensemble. The application of the NGR method provides an ensemble which encompasses the observations, unlike the EVMOS scheme. However, by taking into account the observational error, the analysis suggests that the ensemble based on the EVMOS post-processing scheme is also found to be consistent. This apparent contradiction is clarified and it turns out that both schemes are valuable depending on the specific purpose, the evaluation of the uncertainty of large scale flows or the downscaling of the temperature uncertainty at the level of the local observations. Copyright © 2010 Royal Meteorological Society

[1]  A. Sterl,et al.  The ERA‐40 re‐analysis , 2005 .

[2]  R. Buizza,et al.  A Comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP Global Ensemble Prediction Systems , 2005 .

[3]  Daniel S. Wilks,et al.  Comparison of ensemble‐MOS methods in the Lorenz '96 setting , 2006 .

[4]  Bob Glahn,et al.  MOS Uncertainty Estimates in an Ensemble Framework , 2009 .

[5]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[6]  John Derber,et al.  The National Meteorological Center's spectral-statistical interpolation analysis system , 1992 .

[7]  S. Vannitsem,et al.  A unified linear Model Output Statistics scheme for both deterministic and ensemble forecasts , 2009 .

[8]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[9]  F. Bouyssel,et al.  A comparison of two off‐line soil analysis schemes for assimilation of screen level observations , 2009 .

[10]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting-II , 2005 .

[11]  David S. Richardson,et al.  Effects of observation errors on the statistics for ensemble spread and reliability , 2004 .

[12]  Martin Köhler,et al.  Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time‐scales , 2008 .

[13]  Anton H. Westveld,et al.  Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting Using Ensemble Model Output Statistics and Minimum CRPS Estimation , 2005 .

[14]  O. Talagrand,et al.  Impact of observational error on the validation of ensemble prediction systems , 2008 .

[15]  Craig H. Bishop,et al.  The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble , 2010 .

[16]  C. Nicolis,et al.  Dynamical Properties of Model Output Statistics Forecasts , 2008 .

[17]  Neill E. Bowler,et al.  Explicitly Accounting for Observation Error in Categorical Verification of Forecasts , 2006 .

[18]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  Probabilistic Forecast Calibration Using ECMWF and GFS Ensemble Reforecasts. Part I: Two-Meter Temperatures , 2008 .

[19]  F. Molteni,et al.  The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation , 1996 .

[20]  Thomas M. Hamill,et al.  Comparison of Ensemble-MOS Methods Using GFS Reforecasts , 2007 .

[21]  W. Briggs Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[22]  J. Whitaker,et al.  REFORECASTS An Important Dataset for Improving Weather Predictions , 2006 .

[23]  H. Glahn,et al.  The Use of Model Output Statistics (MOS) in Objective Weather Forecasting , 1972 .

[24]  T. Hamill Interpretation of Rank Histograms for Verifying Ensemble Forecasts , 2001 .

[25]  S. Vannitsem,et al.  Dynamical Properties of MOS Forecasts: Analysis of the ECMWF Operational Forecasting System , 2008 .

[26]  E. Kalnay,et al.  Ensemble Forecasting at NCEP and the Breeding Method , 1997 .