Uncertainty analysis on process responses of conventional spinning using finite element method

Conventional spinning is a widely used metal forming process to manufacture rotationally axis-symmetric and asymmetric products. Considerable efforts have been made to investigate the forming quality of spun parts using the process in recent years. However, inherent uncertainty properties involved in the spinning process are rarely considered in previous studies. In this paper, an uncertainty analysis and process optimisation procedure have been developed and implemented on conventional spinning with 3D Finite Element Method (FEM). Three process variables are randomized by Gaussian distribution to study the probabilistic characteristics of two process responses. Linear and quadratic approximate representations are constructed by Monte Carlo based Response Surface Method (RSM) with Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS). The Most Probable Point (MPP) method, which has been widely used to estimate the failure probability in other applications, is further developed in this paper to obtain the probability distribution of the system responses. Following an evaluation of the system responses conducted by the MPP method, a control variable method is used to reduce the variance of spun part wall thickness and total roller force to satisfy the 3σ quality requirement. This uncertainty analysis and process optimisation procedure can be easily implemented in other metal spinning processes.

[1]  Trevor A. Dean,et al.  A review of spinning, shear forming and flow forming processes , 2003 .

[2]  D. C. Kang,et al.  Study on the deformation mode of conventional spinning of plates , 1999 .

[3]  Hui Long,et al.  SIMULATION OF EFFECTS OF MATERIAL DEFORMATION ON THICKNESS VARIATION IN CONVENTIONAL SPINNING , 2008 .

[4]  Mei Zhan,et al.  3D FEM analysis of influence of roller feed rate on forming force and quality of cone spinning , 2007 .

[5]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[6]  J. Hammersley SIMULATION AND THE MONTE CARLO METHOD , 1982 .

[7]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Reliability‐based preform shape design in forging , 2005 .

[8]  Tomaz Rodic,et al.  Adjustment of stochastic responses of typical cold forging systems , 2009 .

[9]  Farid R. Biglari,et al.  Study of Strains Distribution in Spinning Process Using FE Simulation and Experimental Work , 2005 .

[10]  Zhenshan Cui,et al.  Uncertainty quantification using polynomial chaos expansion with points of monomial cubature rules , 2008 .

[11]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Geometric deviations in forging and cooling operations due to process uncertainties , 2004 .

[12]  Hidetoshi Kotera,et al.  A study of the one-path deep drawing spinning of cups , 2005 .

[13]  L. Wang,et al.  A study of effects of roller path profiles on tool forces and part wall thickness variation in conventional metal spinning , 2011 .

[14]  Hui Long,et al.  Investigation of material deformation in multi-pass conventional metal spinning , 2011 .

[15]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability , 1988 .

[16]  Werner Homberg,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Sheet Metal Forming by Spinning (7th ICTP小特集号) -- (Outstanding Papers and Presentations) , 2003 .

[17]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of Uncertainty in Analyses of Complex Systems , 2002 .

[18]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[19]  N. D Steward Handbook of metal-forming processes: Betzalel Avitzur Wiley-Interscience, U.S.A. April 1983 1020pp Price £85.00 ISBN 0-471-03474-6 , 1984 .

[20]  S. Rahman,et al.  A univariate approximation at most probable point for higher-order reliability analysis , 2006 .

[21]  Tomas Jansson,et al.  Reliability analysis of a sheet metal forming process using Monte Carlo analysis and metamodels , 2008 .

[22]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Metal forming: an analysis of spinning processes , 2000 .

[23]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  A review of the mechanics of metal spinning , 2010 .

[24]  Hengan Ou,et al.  Finite element modelling and optimisation of net-shape metal forming processes with uncertainties , 2012 .

[25]  Michał Kleiber,et al.  Response surface method for probabilistic assessment of metal forming failures , 2004 .

[26]  K. Seffen,et al.  International Journal of Solids and Structures , 2015 .

[27]  Hirohiko Arai Robotic metal spinning-shear spinning using force feedback control , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[28]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[29]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 1981 .

[30]  G. Stefanou The stochastic finite element method: Past, present and future , 2009 .

[31]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Most Probable Point-Based Method for Efficient Uncertainty Analysis , 2001 .

[32]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis , 2000 .