Clinically relevant improvement of recurrence-free survival with 5-aminolevulinic acid induced fluorescence diagnosis in patients with superficial bladder tumors.

PURPOSES Fluorescence diagnosis induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid enables more thorough transurethral resection of superficial bladder carcinoma compared with conventional white light. We performed a prospective, single institution, randomized trial to investigate whether the residual tumor rate and long-term tumor recurrence can be decreased by fluorescence diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 301 patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors with white light or fluorescence diagnosis. Transurethral resection was repeated 5 to 6 weeks later to evaluate the residual tumor rate. To determine recurrence-free survival patient followup was performed every 3 months by white light cystoscopy and urine cytology. Recurrence-free survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 191 patients with superficial bladder carcinoma were available for efficacy analysis. The residual tumor rate was 25.2% in the white light arm versus 4.5% in the fluorescence diagnosis arm (p <0.0001). Median followup in the white light arm in 103 cases was 21.2 months (range 4 to 40) compared with 20.5 (range 3 to 40) in the 88 in the fluorescence diagnosis arm. Recurrence-free survival in the fluorescence diagnosis group was 89.6% after 12 and 24 months compared with 73.8% and 65.9%, respectively, in the white light group (p = 0.004). This superiority proved to be independent of risk group. The adjusted hazard ratio of fluorescence diagnosis versus white light transurethral resection was 0.33 (95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.67). CONCLUSIONS Fluorescence diagnosis is significantly superior to conventional white light transurethral resection with respect to the residual tumor rate and recurrence-free survival. The differences in recurrence-free survival imply that fluorescence diagnosis is a clinically relevant procedure for decreasing the number of tumor recurrences.

[1]  L. Guillou,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a method for detecting superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder by light‐induced fluorescence of protoporphyrin IX following topical application of 5‐aminolevulinic acid: Preliminary results , 1997, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[2]  Dmitri Daniltchenko,et al.  FLUORESCENCE ENDOSCOPY WITH 5-AMINOLEVULINIC ACID REDUCES EARLY RECURRENCE RATE IN SUPERFICIAL BLADDER CANCER , 2001 .

[3]  R Baumgartner,et al.  Fluorescence photodetection of neoplastic urothelial lesions following intravesical instillation of 5-aminolevulinic acid. , 1994, Urology.

[4]  A B West,et al.  Superficial bladder tumors (stage pTa, grades 1 and 2): the importance of recurrence pattern following initial resection. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[5]  P. Alken,et al.  Der Wert der transurethralen Nachresektion beim oberflächlichen Harnblasenkarzinom , 1994 .

[6]  P Schneede,et al.  Endoscopic detection of transitional cell carcinoma with 5-aminolevulinic acid: results of 1012 fluorescence endoscopies. , 2001, Urology.

[7]  Martin Kriegmair,et al.  CELLULAR FLUORESCENCE OF THE ENDOGENOUS PHOTOSENSITIZER PROTOPORPHYRIN IX FOLLOWING EXPOSURE TO 5‐AMINOLEVULINIC ACID , 1995, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[8]  H Stepp,et al.  Detection of early bladder cancer by 5-aminolevulinic acid induced porphyrin fluorescence. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[9]  R. Knuechel,et al.  Clinical Results of the Transurethral Resection and Evaluation of Superficial Bladder Carcinomas by Means of Fluorescence Diagnosis after Intravesical Instillation of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid , 1999 .

[10]  C. Busch,et al.  Recurrence and progression in low grade papillary urothelial tumors. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[11]  H. Huland,et al.  Residual tumor discovered in routine second transurethral resection in patients with stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. , 1991, The Journal of urology.