A critical discussion on the use of the notion of conviviality for digital cities

Conviviality is usually considered a positive concept however, as it becomes an instrument at the service of power relations, a darker side emerges. In this survey paper we raise the question: Which definition of conviviality can be used and operationalized for digital cities? We propose a two-fold definition of conviviality as (1) a condition for social interactions and (2) an instrument for the internal regulation of social systems. Furthermore, for digital cities, we propose to use conviviality as a mechanism to reinforce social cohesion and a tool to reduce mis-coordination between individuals, groups and institutions.

[1]  Edith Ackermann,et al.  Playthings that do things: a young kid's "incredibles"! , 2005, IDC '05.

[2]  Toru Ishida,et al.  Understanding Digital Cities , 1999, Digital Cities.

[3]  Philippe Bretier,et al.  ARTIMIS: Natural Dialogue Meets Rational Agency , 1997, IJCAI.

[4]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[5]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[6]  HorvitzEric,et al.  Models of attention in computing and communication , 2003 .

[7]  Jaime Simão Sichman,et al.  Towards a functional ontology of reputation , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[8]  Guido Boella,et al.  Introduction to normative multiagent systems , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[9]  Arnan Sipitakiat,et al.  Digital technology for conviviality : making the most of students' energy and imagination in learning environments , 2001 .

[10]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Models of attention in computing and communication , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[11]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[12]  P. Furlong Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy , 1994 .

[13]  Barbara Messing,et al.  An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems , 2002, Künstliche Intell..

[14]  Oscar Cullmann,et al.  Unity Through Diversity , 1988 .

[15]  I. Illich Tools for Conviviality , 1973 .

[16]  W. Galston Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community , 2001 .

[17]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  BusyBody: creating and fielding personalized models of the cost of interruption , 2004, CSCW.

[18]  Radoslaw Niewiadomski,et al.  Intelligent Expressions of Emotions , 2005, ACII.

[19]  Rosa Maria Vicari,et al.  Social , Affective and Pedagogical Agents for the Recommendation of Student Tutors , 2004 .