Investigating the effect of the reality gap on the human psychophysiological state in the context of human-swarm interaction

The reality gap is the discrepancy between simulation and reality-the same behavioural algorithm results in different robot swarm behaviours in simulation and in reality (with real robots). In this paper, we study the effect of the reality gap on the psychophysiological reactions of humans interacting with a robot swarm. We compare the psychophysiological reactions of 28 participants interacting with a simulated robot swarm and with a real (non-simulated) robot swarm. Our results show that a real robot swarm provokes stronger reactions in our participants than a simulated robot swarm. We also investigate how to mitigate the effect of the reality gap (i.e., how to diminish the difference in the psychophysiological reactions between reality and simulation) by comparing psychophysiological reactions in simulation displayed on a computer screen and psychophysiological reactions in simulation displayed in virtual reality. Our results show that our participants tend to have stronger psychophysiological reactions in simulation displayed in virtual reality (suggesting a potential way of diminishing the effect of the reality gap).

[1]  Luis Magdalena,et al.  An Open Localization and Local Communication Embodied Sensor , 2008, Sensors.

[2]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Human Control of Leader-Based Swarms , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Embodiment and Human-Robot Interaction: A Task-Based Perspective , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[4]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Are emotional robots more fun to play with? , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[5]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Haptic interactions with multi-robot swarms using manipulability , 2015, HRI 2015.

[7]  Ana Paiva,et al.  iCat, the chess player: the influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game , 2008, AAMAS.

[8]  Gerhard Sagerer,et al.  Understanding Social Robots , 2009, 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[9]  Juan Fasola,et al.  A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly , 2013, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[10]  Yutaka Nakamura,et al.  Adaptive foraging for simulated and real robotic swarms: the dynamical response threshold approach , 2016, Swarm Intelligence.

[11]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[12]  A. Mehrabian.  Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in Temperament , 1996 .

[13]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Investigating the effect of increasing robot group sizes on the human psychophysiological state in the context of human–swarm interaction , 2016, Swarm Intelligence.

[14]  Brigitte Le Pévédic,et al.  Effect of agent embodiment on the elder user enjoyment of a game , 2013, ACHI 2013.

[15]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[16]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Explicit vs. Tacit leadership in influencing the behavior of swarms , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[17]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Human-swarm interaction using spatial gestures , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Effect of a robot on user perceptions , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[19]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Human-swarm interaction , 2013, HRI 2013.

[20]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Neglect Benevolence in Human-Swarm Interaction with Communication Latency , 2012, SEMCCO.

[21]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Psychophysiological experimental design for use in human-robot interaction studies , 2007, 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems.

[22]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Wisdom of the swarm for cooperative decision-making in human-swarm interaction , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[23]  Jamy Li,et al.  The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Gesturing at Subswarms: Towards Direct Human Control of Robot Swarms , 2013, TAROS.

[25]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Controllability Characterizations of Leader-Based Swarm Interactions , 2012, AAAI Fall Symposium: Human Control of Bioinspired Swarms.

[26]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Human-computer interaction: psychology as a science of design , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Bounds of Neglect Benevolence in Input Timing for Human Interaction with Robotic Swarms , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[28]  Eliseo Ferrante,et al.  Swarmanoid: A Novel Concept for the Study of Heterogeneous Robotic Swarms , 2013, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[29]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Scalable Human Interaction with Robotic Swarms , 2013 .

[30]  W. Boucsein.  Electrodermal activity, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[31]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering , 2009 .

[32]  P. Lang.  Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications , 1980 .

[33]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Human Interaction With Robot Swarms: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[34]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games , 2005, CIE.

[35]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Connectivity Differences between Human Operators of Swarms and Bandwidth Limitations , 2012, SEMCCO.

[36]  Mauro Birattari,et al.  Swarm robotics , 2014, Scholarpedia.