Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community

This paper shows that for microbial communities, “fences make good neighbors.” Communities of soil microorganisms perform critical functions: controlling climate, enhancing crop production, and remediation of environmental contamination. Microbial communities in the oral cavity and the gut are of high biomedical interest. Understanding and harnessing the function of these communities is difficult: artificial microbial communities in the laboratory become unstable because of “winner-takes-all” competition among species. We constructed a community of three different species of wild-type soil bacteria with syntrophic interactions using a microfluidic device to control spatial structure and chemical communication. We found that defined microscale spatial structure is both necessary and sufficient for the stable coexistence of interacting bacterial species in the synthetic community. A mathematical model describes how spatial structure can balance the competition and positive interactions within the community, even when the rates of production and consumption of nutrients by species are mismatched, by exploiting nonlinearities of these processes. These findings provide experimental and modeling evidence for a class of communities that require microscale spatial structure for stability, and these results predict that controlling spatial structure may enable harnessing the function of natural and synthetic multispecies communities in the laboratory.

[1]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Rate of mixing controls rate and outcome of autocatalytic processes: theory and microfluidic experiments with chemical reactions and blood coagulation. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[2]  D. Or,et al.  Limited diffusive fluxes of substrate facilitate coexistence of two competing bacterial strains. , 2008, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[3]  Colin J Ingham,et al.  The micro-Petri dish, a million-well growth chip for the culture and high-throughput screening of microorganisms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Engineered bidirectional communication mediates a consensus in a microbial biofilm consortium , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  G. Robson,et al.  Fungal Communities Associated with Degradation of Polyester Polyurethane in Soil , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Leakage-free bonding of porous membranes into layered microfluidic array systems. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  David J Beebe,et al.  Spatiotemporal micropatterning of cells on arbitrary substrates. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Microfabrication meets microbiology , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[9]  Luisa Nunziangeli,et al.  Influence of Amino Acids on Low-Density Escherichia coli Responses to Nutrient Downshifts , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  Paul B. Rainey,et al.  Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community , 2007, Nature.

[11]  R. Austin,et al.  Bacterial metapopulations in nanofabricated landscapes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  P. Pason,et al.  Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus Strain B-6 Xylanolytic-Cellulolytic Enzyme System That Degrades Insoluble Polysaccharides , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  D. Newman,et al.  Rethinking 'secondary' metabolism: physiological roles for phenazine antibiotics , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[14]  M. Gillings,et al.  Microcolony Cultivation on a Soil Substrate Membrane System Selects for Previously Uncultured Soil Bacteria , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[15]  Souichiro Kato,et al.  Stable Coexistence of Five Bacterial Strains as a Cellulose-Degrading Community , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  S. Allison.  Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments , 2005 .

[17]  S. Basu,et al.  A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation , 2005, Nature.

[18]  T. Egli,et al.  Dual nutrient limited growth: models, experimental observations, and applications. , 2004, Journal of biotechnology.

[19]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[20]  I M Young,et al.  Interactions and Self-Organization in the Soil-Microbe Complex , 2004, Science.

[21]  J. González-López,et al.  Production of amino acids by free-living heterotrophic nitrogen-fixing bacteria , 1995, Amino Acids.

[22]  D. Kleiner,et al.  Whole cell respiration and nitrogenase activities in Azotobacter vinelandii growing in oxygen controlled continuous culture , 2004, Archives of Microbiology.

[23]  T. Vogel,et al.  A novel method for characterizing the microscale 3D spatial distribution of bacteria in soil , 2003 .

[24]  J. Crawford,et al.  Spatial distribution of bacterial communities and their relationships with the micro-architecture of soil. , 2003, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[25]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[26]  M. Feldman,et al.  Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors , 2002, Nature.

[27]  K. Lewis,et al.  Isolating "Uncultivable" Microorganisms in Pure Culture in a Simulated Natural Environment , 2002, Science.

[28]  J. Tiedje,et al.  A Two-Species Test of the Hypothesis That Spatial Isolation Influences Microbial Diversity in Soil , 2002, Microbial Ecology.

[29]  G. Grundmann,et al.  Spatial Modeling of Nitrifier Microhabitats in Soil , 2001 .

[30]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Microfluidic arrays of fluid-fluid diffusional contacts as detection elements and combinatorial tools. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[31]  C. Codeço,et al.  Competition along a Spatial Gradient of Resource Supply: A Microbial Experimental Model , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[32]  Craig S. Criddle,et al.  Flexible Community Structure Correlates with Stable Community Function in Methanogenic Bioreactor Communities Perturbed by Glucose , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  G M Whitesides,et al.  Fabrication of topologically complex three-dimensional microfluidic systems in PDMS by rapid prototyping. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[34]  S. Molin,et al.  Role of commensal relationships on the spatial structure of a surface-attached microbial consortium. , 2000, Environmental microbiology.

[35]  T. Beppu,et al.  Establishing the independent culture of a strictly symbiotic bacterium Symbiobacterium thermophilum from its supporting Bacillus strain. , 1999, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[36]  Michael Travisano,et al.  Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment , 1998, Nature.

[37]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[38]  Robert M. May,et al.  Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics , 1994, Nature.

[39]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[40]  F. G. Bader,et al.  Analysis of double‐substrate limited growth , 1978, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[41]  B. K. Ghosh,et al.  Characteristics of Penicillinase Release by Washed Cells of Bacillus licheniformis , 1968, Journal of bacteriology.