Factors Influencing Information Seeking by Physical Therapists Providing Stroke Management

Background: Searching and reading the research literature are essential activities for enhancing the use of research and optimizing the quality of physical therapist practice. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to identify practitioner, organization, and research characteristics that are associated with searching or reading the research literature among physical therapists involved in stroke management. Design: A cross-sectional study design was used. Methods: A survey questionnaire was mailed to 1,155 physical therapists in neurological practice in Ontario, Canada. Therapists who treated people with stroke were eligible to participate. Results: Of the 334 eligible respondents, 270 (80.8%) completed a questionnaire. Among participants with complete data, 37.7% of 265 participants conducted online literature searches and 73.3% of 266 participants read the research literature 2 or more times in a typical month. The following factors were associated with conducting online literature searches 2 or more times in a typical month: participation in research, self-efficacy for implementing evidence-based practice (EBP), being male, perceived facility support of research use, and Internet access to bibliographic databases at work. The following factors were associated with reading the literature 2 or more times in a typical month: participation in research, EBP self-efficacy, membership in a professional organization, perceived facility support of research use, and positive perceptions about the usefulness of the research literature and the relevance of walking interventions evaluated in the stroke rehabilitation research literature. A positive association between searching and reading was observed (odds ratio=16.5, 95% confidence interval=5.8–47.1). Limitations: The cross-sectional design limited inferences of causality. Conclusion: Despite a low frequency of searching, the majority of the participating therapists acquired and read the research literature on a monthly basis. Online searching and reading are closely linked behaviors. Modifiable practitioner characteristics, including self-efficacy for implementing EBP and participation in research, appear to be key determinants of EBP.

[1]  H. Hricak,et al.  Evidence-based medicine. , 1997, Singapore medical journal.

[2]  Emma Irvin,et al.  Surfing for Back Pain Patients: The Nature and Quality of Back Pain Information on the Internet , 2001, Spine.

[3]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  Self-efficacy and work-related performance: the integral role of individual differences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Adopting health behavior change theory throughout the clinical practice guideline process , 2007, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[5]  E. Peterson.  Measures of Perceived Self-Efficacy as a Method of Evaluating Educational Outcomes: An Introduction , 2006 .

[6]  Martin Eccles,et al.  Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. , 2004, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[7]  P. Duncan,et al.  Adherence to Postacute Rehabilitation Guidelines Is Associated With Functional Recovery in Stroke , 2002, Stroke.

[8]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[10]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  Postacute stroke guideline compliance is associated with greater patient satisfaction. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Barriers to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[13]  F. Myrick,et al.  Research utilization and clinical nurse educators: A systematic review. , 2006, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[14]  D. Jette,et al.  A qualitative study of clinical decision making in recommending discharge placement from the acute care setting. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[15]  D. Christakis,et al.  Pediatricians' use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[16]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Reasons, assessments and actions taken: sex and age differences in uses of Internet health information. , 2008, Health education research.

[17]  R. Barclay-Goddard,et al.  Influences on Treatment Choices in Stroke Rehabilitation: Survey of Canadian Physical Therapists , 2005 .

[18]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching , 2001 .

[19]  Nir Menachemi,et al.  Examining the adoption of electronic health records and personal digital assistants by family physicians in Florida. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[20]  T. Whitfield,et al.  Physiotherapists' use of evidence based practice: a cross-national study. , 1997, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[21]  Sharon E Straus,et al.  Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach It , 2010 .

[22]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[23]  Matthew M. Gushta,et al.  Individual determinants of research utilization: a systematic review. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[24]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[25]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[26]  D. Sackett.  Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 2018 .

[27]  E. Peterson,et al.  Using Perceived Self-Efficacy to Measure Outcomes: Evaluation of a Two-Day Course , 2007 .

[28]  Jenny Field,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey , 1998, BMJ.

[29]  Lorie A. Kloda,et al.  Creation and pilot testing of StrokEngine: a stroke rehabilitation intervention website for clinicians and families. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[30]  S. Jaglal,et al.  Practitioner and Organizational Barriers to Evidence-based Practice of Physical Therapists for People With Stroke , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[31]  S. Jaglal,et al.  Physical Therapists’ Experiences Updating the Clinical Management of Walking Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Qualitative Study , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[32]  S. Tsai.  Nurses' participation and utilization of research in the Republic of China. , 2000, International journal of nursing studies.

[33]  T. Liesegang,et al.  Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users' guides to patient care. Guyatt GH,*(1) Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, Cook DJ, Green L, Naylor CD, Wilson MC, Richardson WS for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 2000;284:1290-1296. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  S. Closs,et al.  Perceived barriers to research utilization: a survey of four therapies , 1998 .

[35]  S. Satya‐Murti.  Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM , 1997 .

[36]  D. Jette,et al.  Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[37]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[38]  S. Rappolt.  The role of professional expertise in evidence-based occupational therapy. , 2003, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[39]  Mark R Elkins,et al.  A Description of the Trials, Reviews, and Practice Guidelines Indexed in the PEDro Database , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[40]  Michel Wensing,et al.  What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence‐based practice , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[41]  D. Berwick.  Disseminating innovations in health care. , 2003, JAMA.

[42]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[43]  A. Moseley,et al.  Challenges for evidence-based physical therapy: accessing and interpreting high-quality evidence on therapy. , 2004, Physical Therapy.

[44]  Lars Wallin,et al.  Predicting Research Use in Nursing Organizations: A Multilevel Analysis , 2007, Nursing research.

[45]  S. Rappolt,et al.  How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge , 2002, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[46]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.