Non-linearities in response properties of insect visual cells: an analysis in time and frequency domain.

Intracellularly recorded voltage responses of the visual cells of the blowfly (Calliphora erythrocephala) were analysed in the time and frequency domains. The photoreceptors were stimulated with pulse (impulse), sine, sine-sweep and pseudorandomly (white noise) modulated green light. The blowfly photoreceptor responses, as analysed from the linear transfer functions, seem to arise from a system similar to that of cascaded low-pass filters, with a corner frequency at about 63 Hz (SD +/- 12 Hz). The system is likely to have at least five poles, including one linear second order term, and a pure delay element. Arising from the non-linearities a second harmonic can be seen in the power spectra of responses elicited by sine modulated light. This non-linearity is at least partly explained by the self-shunting property of the membrane voltage response. Light adaptation increases the non-linearities in frequencies lower than 20 Hz, as seen in the decrease of the coherence function with the signal-to-noise ratio remaining constant. Light adaptation also accelerates the transduction process and it appears in the linear transfer function in a form typical to negative feedback. With low stimulus frequencies it causes a 'phase lead'-type non-linearity. In addition, the sine-sweep responses show quite different frequency characteristics in respect of depolarization and repolarization. Lateral inhibition between photoreceptor responses recorded from retinular cell axons in the lamina appears as a drop in gain and as an increasing phase-lag in frequencies from 30 Hz upwards in linear transfer functions. The source of this capacitive-like coupling can be considered to be in the high resistance barriers compartmentalizing the second optic ganglion into discrete anatomical units.

[1]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of Limulus , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  N. Grzywacz,et al.  Statistical test of linearity of photoreceptor transduction process: Limulus passes, others fail. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  M. Fuortes,et al.  Responses to single photons in visual cells of Limulus , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  M Järvilehto Processing of visual information in the insect retina. , 1978, Medical biology.

[6]  J. T. Leutscher-Hazelhoff,et al.  Linear and non‐linear performance of transducer and pupil in Calliphora retinula cells. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  T. Lamb Effects of temperature changes on toad rod photocurrents. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M Järvilehto,et al.  Photoreceptor latency: analysis and definition. , 1986, Experimental biology.

[9]  Andrew S. French,et al.  Phototransduction in the fly compound eye exhibits temporal resonances and a pure time delay , 1980, Nature.

[10]  F. Zettler,et al.  Neuronal Processing in the First Optic Neuropile of the Compound Eye of the Fly , 1976 .

[11]  F. Harris On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  S. Bäckström,et al.  The inhibitory effect of glutathione on some processes of animalization. , 1958 .

[14]  S. R. Shaw,et al.  Retinal resistance barriers and electrical lateral inhibition , 1975, Nature.

[15]  D. Osborne Movements in Plants , 1970, Nature.

[16]  A S French,et al.  The dynamic behaviour of photoreceptor cells in the fly in response to random (white noise) stimulation at a range of temperatures. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  S. Shaw Early visual processing in insects. , 1984, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  A S French,et al.  The linear dynamic properties of phototransduction in the fly compound eye. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.