Applying an information-seeking dialogue model in an interactive information retrieval system

– People often engage in different information-seeking strategies (ISSs) within a single information-seeking episode. A critical concern for the design of information retrieval (IR) systems is how to provide support for these different behaviors in a manner which searchers can easily understand, navigate and use, as they move from one ISS to another. The purpose of this paper is to describe a dialogue structure that was implemented in an experimental IR system, in order to address this concern. , – The authors conducted a user-centered experiment to evaluate the IR systems. Participants were asked to search for information on two different task types, with four different topics per task, in both the experimental system and a baseline system emulating state-of-the-art IR systems. The authors report here the results related explicitly to the use of the experimental system's dialogue structure. , – For one of the task types, most participants followed the search steps as predicted in the dialogue structures, and those who did so completed the task in fewer moves. For the other task type, predicted order of moves was often not followed, but participants again used fewer moves when following the predicted order. Results demonstrate that the dialogue structures the authors designed indeed support effective human information behavior patterns in a variety of ways, and that searchers can effectively use a system which changes to support different ISSs. , – This study shows that it is both possible and beneficial, to design an IR system which can support multiple ISSs, and that such a system can be understood and used successfully.

[1]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Query length in interactive information retrieval , 2003, SIGIR.

[2]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  The Stratified Model of Information Retrieval Interaction: Extension and Applications , 1997 .

[3]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Intelligent Information Retrieval: Whose Intelligence? , 1996, ISI.

[4]  N. Belkin,et al.  A classification of interactions with information , 2002 .

[5]  Adelheit Stein,et al.  Modelling the Illocutionary Aspects of Information-Seeking Dialogues , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Ulrich Thiel,et al.  A Conversational Model of Multimodal Interaction , 1993, AAAI 1993.

[7]  Chirag Shah,et al.  Effects of position and number of relevant documents retrieved on users' evaluations of system performance , 2010, TOIS.

[8]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  Knowledge-Based Search Tactics , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  Xiaojun Jenny Yuan,et al.  Supporting Multiple Information-Seeking Strategies in a Single System Framework , 2006, NAACL.

[10]  Robert N. Oddy,et al.  INFORMATION RETRIEVAL THROUGH MAN‐MACHINE DIALOGUE , 1977 .

[11]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Interaction with Texts: Information Retrieval as Information-Seeking Behavior , 1993, Information Retrieval.

[12]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Braque: Design of an Interface to Support User Interaction in Information Retrieval , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  I 3 R: a new approach to the design of document retrieval systems , 1987 .

[14]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[15]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory , 1996, J. Documentation.

[16]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  Modern Information Retrieval - the concepts and technology behind search, Second edition , 2011 .

[17]  Kevin Li,et al.  Faceted metadata for image search and browsing , 2003, CHI '03.

[18]  David R. Karger,et al.  Scatter/Gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[19]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[20]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Interactive information retrieval , 2008 .

[21]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Cases, scripts, and information-seeking strategies: On the design of interactive information retrieval systems , 1995 .

[22]  David Gelernter,et al.  Lifestreams: an alternative to the desktop metaphor , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[23]  Norbert Fuhr,et al.  A probability ranking principle for interactive information retrieval , 2008, Information Retrieval.

[24]  Rachel Reichman,et al.  Getting computers to talk like you and me , 1985 .

[25]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Evaluation Challenges and Directions for Information-Seeking Support Systems , 2009, Computer.

[26]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Fast, Flexible Filtering with Phlat — Personal Search and Organization Made Easy , 2006 .

[27]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory , 1997, J. Documentation.

[28]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  The TREC Interactive Tracks: Putting the User into Search , 2005 .

[29]  Benjamin D. Brunk,et al.  Toward a General Relation Browser , 2003 .

[30]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Stuff I've Seen: A System for Personal Information Retrieval and Re-Use , 2003, SIGF.

[31]  Pia Borlund,et al.  Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2000, J. Documentation.

[32]  Annelise Mark Pejtersen A Library System for Information Retrieval Based on a Cognitive Task Analysis and Supported by an Icon-Based Interface , 1989, SIGIR.